Lisa Rakhmanina, Dian Kusumaningrum


The research is aimed at finding out: (1) the difference between videobloggingstrategy and expository strategy for teaching speaking; (2) the difference between students who have high and low motivation in speaking ability; and (3) the interaction between teaching strategies and motivation in teaching speaking.

Related to the aims of the research, an experimental method is carried out in Faculty of Law, University Prof. Dr. Hazairin, SH, Bengkulu. The population was all of the second semester in 2016/2017 academic year. Two out of four classes consisting of 25 students from each were taken as the sample by applying cluster random sampling. They were Class A as the experimental group and Class B as the control group. The experimental group was learning speaking using Videoblogging strategy, while the control group was learning using expository strategy. The instruments for collecting the data were a questionnaire on speaking motivation and a speaking test. Cronbach Alpha formula was used to measure the reliability of items on the instruments. Based on the two formulas, it was found that all of 44 items in the speaking motivation questionnaire were valid. Furthermore, it was found out that the data were in normal distribution and homogeneous based on the normality testing and homogeneity testing. The writer analyzed the speaking test scores of students who had high and low reading motivation in the experimental and control groups. Multifactor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tuckey test were applied.

Based on the result of data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) Learning speaking through videoblogging is more effective than expository strategy ; (2) the students who have high learning motivation have higher speaking ability than those who have low one; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching strategies and motivation for the teaching of speaking.

Therefore, it is recommended that: (1) teachers apply videoblogging process in teaching students speaking; (2) to promote students’ learning motivation, it is important to give students chance to develop their own ideas and share the ideas in their personal videoblog (vlog); and (3) future researchers may conduct the same kind of research with different sample and condition.



student-made video, project work, learning experience

Full Text:



Things You Should Know About Videoblogging. (2005). by EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from

Armstrong, L, Berry, M. & Lamshed, R. (2004). Blogs as Electronic Learning Journals., e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (e-Jist). 7:1, from

Aydin, S. (2014). The use of blogs in learning English as a foreign language. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(1), pp. 244-259. Retrieved from: http//

Bryant, S. C. (2006). Videoblogging for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons

Chaney, A.L., & T.L. Burk. (1998). Teaching oral communication in grades K-8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Christensen, Lary B. (1977). Experimental methodology. London: Allyn and Bacon Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research; planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice-Hall.

Frank Nack. (2005). Media impact. Video blogging: Content to the max. (Conrad Parker and Silvia Pfeifer). Published by the IEEE Computer Society.

Gao, W., et al. (2010). Vlogging: A Survey of Videoblogging Technology on the Web. ACM Computing Surveys, (42)4. Pp: 15.1 – 15.55.

Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman Publishing.

Herring, S., Scheidt, L., & Bonus, S. (2004). Bridging the Gap: A Genre Analysis of Weblogs, Proceedings 37th Annual HICSS Conference, Big Island, Hawaii, January, 2004. Retrieved from

Kaga, Spencer. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.

Mutmainna, M. (2016). Implementing blogs as a learning tool in ASIAN EFL/ESL learning context. BRAC University Journal, XI(1), 27-35.

Nardi, B., Schiano, D., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why We Blog. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. December. Pp. 41-46. Retrieved, from

Sanjaya, Wina. (2009). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI