Integrated Anti-Corruption Education in Teaching and Learning Process: An Overview of Pragmatics Class at Andalas University

Ike Revita

Abstract


 

Corruption lately becomes the prominent problem in Indonesia. This corruption occurs almost in every aspect of life. Every prospected people are of great possibility to corrupt. This is in line with the wise words that power tends to corrupt.  The government has tried hard to overcome this by founding KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission). The action against corruption ideally is not only done by KPK but also every people in Indonesia, including educational institution. As an institution of creating the characterized agent, the educational institution is responsible to educate the students to be anti-corruptor. One simple way is by implementing it in the teaching and learning process. This writing is aimed at describing some tricks of integrating anti-corruption value in teaching and learning process. The research is conducted in Pragmatics class at English Department Andalas University.  Pragmatics is a compulsory subject offered to English Department Students at Andalas University. The research is qualitatively and descriptively done. By applying the concept of long- life learning by Ramsden (1992), it is found some ways of integrating the value of anti-corruption in teaching and learning process. They are in (1) class action--course contracts reflecting anti-corruption; (2) evaluation--honest and discipline; and (3) assessment--transparency. These all are designed, written, and socialized in syllabus.


Keywords


anti-corruption, teaching and learning process, Pragmatics, value, education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allsop, Jake. 1983. Cassell’s Students’English Grammar. UN:Cassell Ltd

Anwar, Khaidir. 1995. Beberapa Aspek Sosio-Kultural Masalah Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

Ardisasmita, Syamsa. 2006. ‘Definisi Korupsi Menurut Perspektif Hukum dan E-Announcement untuk Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Lebih Terbuka, Transparan, dan Akuntabel’. Seminar Nasional. Upaya Perbaikan Sistem Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta: KPK RI

Asher, R.E. 1994. The Encyclopedy of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergam

Djamarah & Zain . 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

KPK. 2006. Memahami untuk Membasmi. Jakarta: KPK

Kompas, 22 Februari 2012 Kompas, 7 Februari 2011

Langacker, R. 1972. Fundamental of Linguistic Analysis. New York: Harcourt

Moleong, Lexy J. 1991. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Oktavianus and Revita, Ike. 2013. ‘Nilai-nilai Antikorupsi dalam Petatah Petitih Bahasa Minangkabau. Laporan Penelitian. Tidak Dipublikasi. Padang: Universitas Andalas

Ramsden, Paul. 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge

Revita, Ike. 2006. ‘Cyberspace dan Filsafat Bertutur Masyarakat Minangkabau’. Simposium Internasional Dies Natalis ke-60 dan Lustrum ke-12 FIB UGM. Yogyakarta. 16-17 Maret

Revida, Erika. 2003. ‘Korupsi di Indonesia:Masalah dan Solusinya’. Laporan Penelitian. Medan: USU

Subroto, Edi. 1992. Pengantar Metoda Penelitian Linguistik Struktural. Surakarta:Sebelas Maret Univeristy Press

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press

Tim MKDK. 2002. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Padang:FIP UNP

Toelihere, Mozes. 1984. Pedoman Perbaikan Pengajaran. Jakarta: UI Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang



This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI