A TRAINING MODEL FOR INDONESIAN HIGH SCHOOL DEBATERS

Delvi Wahyuni

doi:10.24036/komposisi.v18i2.8091

A TRAINING MODEL FOR INDONESIAN HIGH SCHOOL DEBATERS

Delvi Wahyuni⁽¹⁾,
(1) FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2018 Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/komposisi.v18i2.8091

Full Text:

Language : id

Abstract

This paper discusses a training model suitable for senior high school debaters in Indonesian context. This model is designed to address the difficulties which I have encountered in my years of training senior high school debaters and teachers in West Sumatera Province, Indonesia. One major problem which I have almost always confronted is students’ reluctance to speak despite their interest in debating. These students were afflicted with severe level of speaking anxiety which is hampering their willingness to debate. There are two reasons which prompt this high level of speaking anxiety: lack of background knowledge and language competence. Therefore, scaffolding is needed to deal with those problems. This model comprises of several steps, which are: Background Knowledge Building; Constructing Arguments For and Against a Motion; and Delivering the Arguments.

MODEL PELATIHAN DEBAT BAGI PEDEBAT DI TINGKAT SMA DI DI INDONESIA

Abstrak

Makalah ini adalah pemaparan mengenai sebuah model pelatihan debat bahasa Inggris bagi pedebat tingkat SMA di Indonesia. Model ini dirancang berdasarkan pengalaman saya dalam pelaksaan program Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PKM) di bidang bahasa Inggris selama tiga tahun belakangan ini. Permasalahan utama yang saya dihadapi oleh selama melakukan PKM di bidang debat adalah tingginya tingkat speaking anxiety yang dialami oleh Mitra (pedebat tingkat SMA). Akibatnya, kelancaran program PKM sering terganggu karena peserta pelatihan tidak mau berbicara dalam bahasa Inggris walaupun mereka menunjukkan minat yang besar kepada debat itu sendiri. Menurut pengamatan saya, ada dua hal yang menjadi pemicu hal tersebut, yaitu: kurangnya pengetahuan umum dan lemahnya kemahiran berbahasa yang menjadi media penyampaian argumen, yaitu bahasa Inggris. Untuk mengatasi masalah diatas, scaffolding diperlukan. Model pelatihan ini terdiri dari tiga tahapan, yaitu: Background Knowledge Building; Constructing Arguments For and Against a Motion; dan Delivering the Arguments.

Keywords

debate, scaffolding, speaking anxiety, EFL learners, debate proliferation

References

Alasmari, A., & Salahuddin Ahmed, S. (2012). Using Debate in EFL Classes. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 147-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p147

Al-Dosari, H. (2016). Effects of an integrated Reading/Writing approach on improving writing skills of EFL students. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 43, np-np.

Belland B.R. (2014) Scaffolding: Definition, Current Debates, and Future Directions. In: Spector J., Merrill M., Elen J., Bishop M. (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology.New York, NY: Springer.

Burek, D., & Losos, C. (2014). Debate: where speaking and listening come first. Voices from the Middle. 22 (1): 49-57

Ewoldt, K. B., & Morgan, J. J. (2017). Color-Coded Graphic Organizers for Teaching Writing to Students With Learning Disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(3), 175-184.

Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., Boykin, A., Good, K., Hughes, M., MacVittie, N., Chirinos, D. (2016). Emphasizing planning for essay writing with a computer-based graphic organizer. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 170-191. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014402915591697

Fauzan, U. (2016). Enhancing Speaking Ability of EFL Students through Debate and Peer Assessment. EFL Journal, 1(1), 49-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v1i1.8

Foreman-Takano, D. (1992). A rationale for using debate techniques in the EFL composition classroom. Doshisha Daigaku Eigo Eibungaku Kenkyu/Doshisha Studies in English, 56(Mar), 343-357.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Kazdan, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 309-318. doi:10.1177/074193259902000507

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., & al, e. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 15. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/236321199?accountid=25704

Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 34-44. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/194702591?accountid=25704

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language scaffolding learning. Portsmouth, NH. Hienemann.

Gunawan S., A. (2016). Indonesia second least literate of 61 nations. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/03/12/indonesia-second-least-literate-61-nations.html

Iftanti, E. (2012). A survey of the English readig habis of EFL students in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal, 23(2), 149-164. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v23i2/149-164

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan SMA. (2015). Pedoman Nasional School Debating Championship (NSDC) Tahun 2015. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Krieger, D. (2005). Teaching Debate to ESL Students: A Six Class Unit. The Internet TESL Journal. 6 (2): 1-8

Lee, J, Schallert, D.L., Kim, E (2015). Effects of extensive reasing and tranlastion activities on grammar knowledge and attitude for EFL adolescents. System. 52 (), 38-50 doi: org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.016

Lee, Y. (2014). Promise for Enhancing Children's Reading Attitudes Through Peer Reading: A Mixed Method Approach. Journal Of Educational Research, 107(6), 482-492. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.836469

Lieb, M. (2007). Teaching Debate Skills to Intermediate and Lower Level EFL Students (pp. 73-84). Retrieved from http://tht-japan.org/publications/2007/m_lieb73-84.pdf

Mukminin, A, dkk. (2015). EFL Speaking Anxiety among Senior High School Students and Policy Recommendations. Journal of Education and Learning. 9 (3), 217-225.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Sáenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for english language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231-247. doi:10.1177/001440290507100302

Smit, J., A. A. van Eerde, H., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817-834. doi:10.1002/berj.3007

Somjai, S & Jansem, A. (2015). The use of debate technique to develop speaking ability of grade ten students at Bodindecha (Singsinghaseni) School. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications. 13 (Spesial Issue, 27-31.

Stewart, T. (2003). Debate for ESOL Students. TESOL Journal, 12(1), 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2003.tb00114.x

Tsai, C.C. (2014). English as a foreign language speaking anxiety among university of technology students. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods ( MJLTM ). 4 (4), 44-49.

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Widiati, U & Cahyono, B.Y. (2006). The Teaching of EFL Speaking in the Indonesian Context: the State of the Art. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni. 34(2), 269-291

Yaikhong, K & Usaha, S. (2012). A measure of EFL Public Speaking class anxiety : scale development and preliminary validation and reliability. English Language Teaching. 5(12), 23-35.

Yang, Y. C., & Gamble, J. (2013). Effective and practical critical thinking-enhanced EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 67(4), 398-412

Želježič, M. (2017). Debate in EFL Classroom. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives And Enquiries, 14(1), 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/elope.14.1.39-54

Zhang, X. (2017). Reading-writing integrated tasks, comprehensive corrective feedback, and EFL writing development. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 217. doi:10.1177/1362168815623291