Evaluasi PJOK Model Kirkpatrick Untuk Peningkatan Hasil Belajar dan Sikap Kebiasaan Baru Pasca Pandemi di Sekolah Dasar

Suroso Suroso(1), Bambang Ismanto(2), Suhartono Suhartono(3),
(1) Universitas Terbuka, DKI Jakarta  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Kota Salatiga  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Terbuka, DKI Jakarta  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jippsd.v7i2.123877

Full Text:    Language : id

Abstract


This study aimed to provide an overview regarding the evaluation of Kirkpatrick's model in Physical Education. A descriptive qualitative was conducted in this research. The sample was 17 students from fourth grade as the control class and 24 students from the fifth grade of Elementary School. The data in this study were collected using a questionnaire. Student responses to Kirkpatrick's assessment model and the scoring rubric used were very positive, as proved by the results of students' independent work. The students performed well in academic evaluations. In the assessment, assessors can prioritize the direction to be achieved, student targets, and measurement columns. Students enthusiastically express all the possibilities that exist within them. The success of each program implemented is very dependent on the responses and results of students who experience increased knowledge, skills, and attitudes of students in realizing the final task given by the teacher. It appears that the results for the control class were 94.12% of students able to take part in the PJOK learning process in the good category and in the impact class 91.67% of students were able to take part in the PJOK learning process in the good category. In conclusion, this study indicated that using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model in Physical Education subject during the learning process had been very and can explore all students’ competence.

 


Keywords


Evaluation of Kirkpatrick's Model; Learning Outcomes; New Habit; Elementary School

References


Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar. 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahapeserta didik dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1998. Studi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bina Aksara.

Azwar, S. 2013. Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

B. Uno, Hamzah. 2019. Teori Semangat dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ecols, John M.. 2016. Kamus Inggris – Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ghani, Abd. Rahman A. 2014. Metodologi Studi Tindakan Sekolah. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2003. Prosedur Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Hamalik, Oemar. 2015. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Kirkpatrick, Donald. L. 1998. Evaluating Training Programs. 2nd Edition. San Fransisco Berret-Koehler Publisher, Inc.

Putri, R. K. (2017). Sikap Sosial Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Penjas Di SMP Negeri 2 Mlati Sleman Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. 06 (12): 1-8.

Ramadhayani, E., Noviati, W., Syafruddin., Deniati, L., & Kurniati, E. (2020). Analisis Penilaian Sikap Siswa Biologi Selama Pembelajaran Daring Pada Era Tatanan Baru. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. 10 (02) :107-110

Rahayu, Ega,T. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani. Bandung: Alfabeta. Rohmah. (2016). Konsep E-Learning Dan Aplikasinya Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: AnNur.

Rifa’i, Achmad dan Catharina Tri Anni. 2016. Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: Pusat Pengembangan MKU/MKDK-LP3 Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Rusli Luthan, dkk. 2000. Studi Penjaskes. Jakarta : Depdiknas.

Sardiman, A.M. 2012. Interaksi dan Semangat Belajar Mengajar. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada

Slameto. 2010. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor Yang Memengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudaryono. (2012). Dasar – Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sudijono, Anas. 2007. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, Djuju. 2006. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

SugiyoNomor 2012. Metode Penelitan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyo Nomor 2013. Metode Studi Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Studi Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabet

Supandi, 1992. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan.

Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Jasmani.

Suprananto, K. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Susanto, Ahmad. 2013. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri

Thaeb, R. M. (2016). Menumbuhkan Sikap Siswa Dalam Pencapaian Hasil Belajar. Lantanida. (4): 50-59.

Tu’u, Tulus. 2008. Peran Disiplin Pada Perilaku dan Prestasi Siswa. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Widoyoko, E.P. (2017). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 119 times
 PDF Downloaded : 41 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.