QUALITY OF WORDWALL-ASSISTED PHYSICS LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

Faizatul Diani - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


The instruments used in research must meet the criteria for instrument feasibility so that accountable data is produced. The feasibility of the instrument can be measured by means of a trial. Through trials, the validity and reliability of the instrument can be determined. This research aims to develop a physics learning outcomes test instrument assisted by wordwall. To achieve the research objectives, we used research and development (R&D) model of 4D design (Define, design, development, dissemination). The instrument develop was a multiple choice test consisting of 15 items. The subject of trial involved 30 students of class X SMAN 1 Tanjung Mutiara. Based on the results of the trial 13 of the 15 items of the instrument proved to be valid with the value of tcount > ttable = 2,05 which means it meets the valid criteria. The results of the reliability test measurement of 13 instrument items obtained a value of 0,72 which means it has high reability. Based on the findings of validity test and reability test, it is conclused that the instrument development has met the feasibility to measuring the physics learning outcomes on global warming material.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. S. Amalia, D. Desnita, F. Festiyed, and A. Putra, “Validity and Reliability of the Student Perception Questionnaire Instrument regarding the Implementation of the Problem-Based Learning Model in High School Physics Learning,” PILLAR Phys. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2024.

A. A. Hidayat, Menyusun Instrumen Penelitian & Uji Validitas-Reliabilitas. Health Books Publishing, 2021.

B. I. Sappaile, “Konsep Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 13, no. 66, pp. 379–391, 2007, doi: 10.24832/jpnk.v13i66.356.

S. Hayati and Lailatussaadah, “VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS INSTRUMEN Salma Hayati,” J. Ilm. Didakt., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 169–179, 2016.

S. K. Dewi and A. Sudaryanto, “Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Pengetahuan , Sikap dan Perilaku Pencegahan Demam Berdarah,” Semin. Nas. Keperawatan Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2020, pp. 73–79, 2020.

M. Syelviani, “PENTINGNYA MANAJEMEN WAKTU DALAM MENCAPAI EFEKTIVITAS BAGI MAHASISWA (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Program Studi Manajemen Unisi),” J. Anal. Manaj., vol. 6, no. 1, 2020.

F. D. P. Anggraini, A. Aprianti, V. A. V. Setyawati, and A. A.

Hartanto, “Pembelajaran Statistika Menggunakan Software SPSS untuk Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6491–6504, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3206.

M. F. Ramadhan, R. A. Siroj, and M. W. Afgani, “Validitas and Reliabilitas,” J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885.

S. Azwar, Reliabilitas dan Validitas. PUSTAKA PELAJAR, 2012.

A. Suryadi, Evaluasi Pembelajaran Jilid II. jawa barat: CV. Jejak, 2020.

S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.

Sugiono, Noerdjanah, and A. Wahyu, “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Alat Ukur SG Posture Evaluation,” J. Keterapian Fis., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.37341/jkf.v5i1.167.

L. F. Zarafayana and L. Rosdiana, “Validitas Permainan Congklak pada Materi Tata Surya untuk Siswa SMP Kelas VII,” PENSA E-JURNAL Pendidik. SAINS, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 2020.

R. Heale and A. Twycross, “Validity and reliability in quantitative studies,” Evid. Based. Nurs., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 66–67, 2015, doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102129.

I. Ahmed and S. Ishtiaq, “Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research,” J. Pak. Med. Assoc., vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 2401–2406, 2021, doi: 10.47391/JPMA.06-861.

L. SÜRÜCÜ and A. MASLAKÇI, “Validity and reliability in quantitavie research,” Bus. Manag. Stud. An Int. J., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2694–2726, 2020.

R. Al Hakim, I. Mustika, and W. Yuliani, “VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS ANGKET MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI,” FOKUS (Kajian Bimbing. Konseling dalam Pendidikan), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 263–268, 2021.

S. Ndiung and M. Jediut, “Pengembangan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika peserta didik sekolah dasar berorientasi pada berpikir tingkat tinggi,” Prem. Educ. J. Pendidik. Dasar dan Pembelajaran, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 94–111, 2020, doi: 10.25273/pe.v10i1.6274.

S. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, 2017.

Y. octobe Purba, Fadhilaturrahmi, J. T. Purba, and kevin william andri Siahaan, Teknik Uji Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan, vol. 01, no. 02. 2021.

H. Puspasari and W. Puspita, “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Tingkat Pengetahuan dan Sikap Mahasiswa terhadap Pemilihan Suplemen Kesehatan dalam Menghadapi Covid-19,” J. Kesehat., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 2022, doi: 10.26630/jk.v13i1.2814.

A. R. Kasdina, F. S. Sundari, and R. Handayani, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Hots Berbantuan Website Wordwallpada Materi Bangun Ruang,” vol. 9, no. September, 2023.

H. Christianto, D. Lestarani, and A. C. Lalang, “Pelatihan Pembuatan Instrumen Soal Menggunakan Aplikasi Quizizz dan Wordwall bagiGuru-Guru Kimia se-NTT,” Nucl. Phys., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 104–116, 2023.

P. Gandasari and P. Pramudiani, “Pengaruh Aplikasi Wordwall terhadap Motivasi Belajar IPA Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” Edukatif J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 3689–3696, 2021, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1079.

A. A. Mujahidin, U. H. Salsabila, A. L. Hasanah, M. Andani, and W. Aprillia, “Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran Daring (Quizizz, Sway, dan Wordwall) Kelas 5 di SD Muhammadiyah 2 Wonopeti,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 552–560, 2021, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v1i2.3109.

S. Rohman, “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom,” Al-Ibrah J. Pendidik. dan Keilmuan Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 86–108, 2023, doi: 10.61815/alibrah.v8i1.262.

R. Sundayana, Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.

R. Rifana, D. Burhanudin, and E. Septiyanti, “Analisis Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Ujian Sekolah Smp Negeri 4 Dumai,” J. Ilm. Bina Edukasi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–129, 2021, doi: 10.33557/jedukasi.v14i2.1582.

Gunawan, L. Kustiani, and L. S. Hariani, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Hasil Belajar Siswa,” vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2018.

N. Suryanti, “Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar

Akuntansi Keuangan Menengah 1,” J. Ilm. Akuntasi dan Humanika, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1393–1406, 2014.

E. Kusumawati and M. Fadiana, “Pemanfaatan Game Edukasi Wordwall untuk Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1566–1573, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/16201171074