TEACHERS’ CREATIVITY IN TRANSFORMING THE MANDATED CURRICULUM INTO A LINGUISTICALLY AND CULTURALLY DIVERSE PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE

Joko Nurkamto

Abstract


English language teaching in high schools in Indonesia is carried out based on a nationally compiled curriculum which tends to be standardized and prescriptive – one for all (Widodo, 2016). In reality, the situation in which English is taught and learned is highly complex, due to the interaction of a number of variables, such as political, economic, and geographical factors, as well as the school, the teachers, and the students (Richards, 2002). Therefore, in order to teach successfully, the teacher, as the implementer of the curriculum, needs to interpret this policy creatively in accordance with the situation and context in the field. According to Matsumoto (2009: 160), creativity is “the capacity to produce new art, ideas, techniques, or other products which are useful, aesthetically appealing, meaningful, and correct within a particular field.” In this paper, I will explain the different forms of the teacher’s creativity in teacahing -- the knowledge and skills of the teacher in selecting and applying the appropriate teaching strategies for transforming the lesson (Huizinga, Handlezalts, Nieveen, and Voogt, 2013). In addition to broadening our understanding of the concept of creativity in the teaching of the English language, it is also hoped that this paper will provide input for teachers in the implementation of their pedagogical duties in the field. 


Keywords


teacher’s creativity, mandated curriculum, pedagogical practice, and particular contexts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustien, Helena I.R. (2014). The 2013 English curriculum: the paradigm, interpretation and implementation. In Handoyo Puji Widodo and Nugrahenny T. Zacharias (Eds.), Recent issues in English language education: challenges and directions (pp.39-64). Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Brown, H. Douglas. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Burns, Anne and Joyce, Helen de Silva. (2007). Challenging requirements: how teachers navigate to make changes within required curricula. In Anne Burns and Helen de Silva Joyce (Eds.), Planning and teaching creatively within a required cirriculum for adult leaners (pp. 1-14). Virginia: Teachers of English to peakers of Other Languages Inc.

Derewianka, Beverly. (2004). Exploring how texts work. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association,

Farrell, Thomas S.C. (2013). Reflective teaching. Virginia: TESOL International Association.

Freeman, Diane Larsen. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gerot, Linda and Wigness, Peter. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabber.

Graves, Kathleen. (2000). Designing language courses: a guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Thomson Learning.

Graves, Kathleen. (2009). Series editor’s preface. In Katleen Granes and Lucilla Lopriore (Eds.), Developing a new curriculum for school-age learners (pp. v-vi). Virginia: TESOL International Association.

Hamied, Fuad Abdul. (2014). Curriculum change: what does it mean to Indonesian TEFL?. In Handoyo Puji Widodo and Nugrahenny T. Zacharias (Eds.), Recent issues in English language education: challenges and directions (pp.13-37). Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Huizinga, Tjark; Handelzalts, Adam; Nieveen, Nienke; and Voogt, Joke M. (2014). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertice. Journal of cucciculum studies, 46 (1), 33-57.

Jones and Richards. (2016). Creativity and language teaching. In Rodney H. Jones and Jack C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: perspectives from research and practice (pp.3-15). New York: Routledge.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Matsumoto, David (Ed.). (2009). The cambridge dictionary of psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayes, Eve. (2013). Negotiating the hidden curriculum: power and affect in negotiated clasrooms. English in Australia, 48 (3), 62-71.

Nation, I.S.P., and Macalister, John. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.

Nuh, Muhammad. (2013). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 69 tahun 2013 tentang kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum sekolah menengah atas/madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Nuh, Muhammad. (2013). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 54 tahun 2013, tentang standar kompetensi lulusan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Nuh, Muhammad. (2013). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia nomor 65 tahun 2013 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Nuh, Muhammad. (2013). Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia nomor 66 tahun 2013 tentang standar penilaian pendidikan. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Richards and Cotterall. (2016). Exploring creativity in language teaching. In Rodney H. Jones and Jack C. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: perspectives from research and practice (pp.97-113). New York: Routledge.

Richards, Jack C. (2002). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack C. and Rodgers, Theodore S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Soekarnoputri, Megawati. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Jakarta: Sekretarian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Strickland, Bonnie (Ed.). (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. Detroit: Gale Group.

Tan, Charlene. (2016). Teacher agency and school-based curriculum in China’s non-elite schools. Springer.

Westwood, Peter. (2008). What teachers need to know about teaching methods. Victoria: Acer Press.

Widodo, Handoyo Puji. (2016). Language policy in practice: reframing the English language curriculum in the Indoneian secondary education sector. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in Asia (pp. 127-151). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI