TEACHING ENGLISH IN MULTILINGUAL SOCIETIES

Irwan Prayitno

Abstract


In the era of globalization, Eglish becomes the most powerful and essential tool of communication. Consequently, teaching and learning English must be placed at a seriously important priority of educational system. In order to achieve the ideal outcome of teaching and learning English in multilingual society, three major aspects should be taken into account: 1) teachers, 2) teaching methods, and 3) teaching materials. The flourishing English teachers are always characterized by three dominant charateristics: 1) high degree of reflectivity, 2) high sense of efficacy, and 3) highly student-centered teching style. English teaching methods should be creatively developed in order to promote not only lower thinking order (memorizing and understanding) but also higher thinking order, especially creative thinking level. Finally, teaching English materials should be developed on the basis of students’ background knowledge and environment, the concepts, principles, values, and components for adapting didactic issues, and the higher thinking order.


Keywords


teaching English, multilingual society

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abaslou, Azam &Langroudi, Jahanbakhsh (2015). The Effect Of Reflective Teaching on The Intrinsic Motivation And Critical Thinking of Iranian EFL Learners Across Age Groups. Modern Journal Of Language Teaching Methods, Vol. 4, Issue 5.

Akbari R. & Allvar, Nabi Karim (2010). L2 Teacher Characteristics as Predictors of Students’ Academic Achievement. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language. Volume 13, Number 4

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3.

Baktash, N. & Talebinejad, M. R. (2015). Evaluation Of The New Iranian High School Series Books Based On Blooms's Revised Taxonomy : Prospect One In Focus.Modern Journal Of Language Teaching Methods.Vol. 5, Issue 3

Behroozizad, S. Nambiar, Radha M.K. & Amir, Zaini (2015). The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Teacher’s Mediating Role. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies – Vol 18(2): 35 – 48

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-418.

Hosseini, S. M. H. (2007). ELT in higher education in Iran and India: critical view. Language in India, 7, 1-11. Retrieved 04/22/ 2014 from http://www. languageinindia.com dec2007/eltinindiaandiran.pdf

Parke, Margaret B. (1966). Teaching Materials and Their Implementation. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 36, No. 3 pp. 380-387. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1169798 Accessed: 22-04-2016 05:08 UTC

Tschannen-Moran, M, & Hoy, W, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17, 783–805.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI