CLASSROOM INTERACTION: A KEY TO FACILITATE LEARNING
Abstract
The study aims to investigate factors that facilitate learning based on classroom interaction analysis at Fledgling Intemational Standard Schools known as Rintisan Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional (RSBI). The purposes of this study are in particular to find out how the interactions that take place between teacher student, student-teacher, and student-student facilitate learning. The site ofthe research is the Public Senior High Schools located in Padang that are implementirrg RSBI programmes; and the participants are Physics teachers along with their students. Data of this study is drawn from direct classroom observation, questionnaire and intensive intervierw and these data'were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Data analyses reveal the following results. Some ofthe lactors that facilitates learning appeared to be constructive explanation, teacher's response to the students' question. and sharing ideas between or among students the so-called collaborative learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M.(1991). Focus on the clasroom language: An introduction to classroom research for Language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allwright, R. L. (1984). The Importance of Interaction in Clasroom Language Teaching. Applied Lingttistics, 5 (2), 157-171.
Alwasilah. A. C. (2006). Pokoknya kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Bailey, Katleen, and Nunan,David. (1997). Voices from language classroom. Qualitatitive Research in Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bambang, S. Said, H., & Mislan, N. (2012). Constrains and improvement: A case study of the indonesia's intemational standard school in improving its capacity building. Journal of Education and Learning. 16 (1), 22-31.
Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniqttes. A hand bookfor college faculty. San Francisco: John Wiley'& Sons, inc.
Borjars, Kresti and Burridge, Kate (2010). Introducing English Grammar (Second Edition). Hodder Education. an Hachette UK Company. London.
Brophy. J. ( 1969). Teaching. Brussels: IAE.
Burden, P. (2004- July 2012). An examination of attitude chage torvards the use ofjavanese in a university english "conversation" class. RELC Journal -
Carter. Ronald and McCarthty, Michael (2006) Cambridge Gramntar of English: A Comphrehensive Guide Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chamberlain. A, & Llamzon, T. (1982). Sttrdies in classroom interaction. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Chaudron, C. (1990). Second language classroont: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chin. C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher Questioning and feedback to students'responses.
(lnternational Journal of Science Edrication) Retrieved September 20.2010. from University of 51 dnel .
Cresswell. J. W. (1997). Qualitative inqttiry and research design.California: SAGE Piiblication- Inc.
Cummins- J. (2003). The ethics of double think: Langtrage rights and lhe bilingual educatiott debare. Retrieved Februarl'24.2009. from http://wrvrv.iteachilearn.com/cummins/researchbildebate.html
Daniels, H, (2001). Vigotsky and pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Depdiknas. (2007). Panduan pem'elenggaraan rinlisan StrfA bertaraf internasional. Jakarta: Author.
Dornyei. Z. (2008). Queslionnaires in second language research: Construction and process. New York: Routledge.
Ellis. It. (1985). Under.satnding second langttage acquisition. Oxford: Oxford Universitv Press.
Ellis, R. (1987). Second language ocquisition in conlext. Cambridge: Prentice Hall International.
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behaviour.Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Inc.
Gibbon. P, & Hammond, J. (2001). What is scaffolding? ln J.Hammond. Teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Newtown NSW: Primari English Teaching Association.
Glasserfeld. E. V. (1993). Questions and answers about redical constructivism. In K. Tobin, The practice 01
construcivists in science education. Washington: AAAS Publication.
Harbour, L. (2009). Languages in primary school: Teachers' perspectives on policy and implementalion. Germany, VDM Verlag DR. Muller Aktien-eesellschafi.
Hidajat. R. I. (2012). Implementasi kebijakan RSB/. Retrieved February 20,2012. fiom http://u.rvrv.kabarpriangan. com/nervs/detai l/20 1 3
Hogan. K. (1997). lntroduction. In K. Hogan, & M. Persley-Scaffolding student learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues (pp. l-5).Quebec: Brookline Books.
Hogan. K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffblding scientific competencies Within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan, & M. Pressley, Saffolding sludent learning: Inslructional approaches and issues
gp. 7 aa07). Quebec: Brookline Books.
Kalu. I. (2008). Classroom interaction patterns and students'learning outcomes in phlsics. Medttell Journal: The Social Sciences, 3 (1),57-60.
Kimmel. K & Volet, S. (2012). University students perceptions of and attitudes towards culturally diverse group work: Does context matter? Journal of sntdies in Inlernational Education, 16 (157), Retrieved flom jsi.sagepub.com at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia on July 26,2012.
Krashen, S. D. (1991). Bilingual education: A focus on current research. NCBE FOCUS: Occasional Papers in Bilingtnl Education .
Lamon. S. (2003). Beyond constructivism: An improved fitness metaphor forthe acquisition of mathelnatical knowledge. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr, Beyond constntctivism: Models on malhemalical problem
solving, learning and teoching. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lee, C. D.. & Samagorinsky, P. (2000). Vygotskian perspective on literary research: Constntcting meaning through collaborative inquiry. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba. E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publication.
Littleton, K. (2010). Social interaction and learning- United Kingdom: Elsevier.
Lyle. S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical context and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education, 22 (3),222-240.
Marinaccio, P. (2001). Classroom dynamics and middle school studenls. Florida: University of Miami.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research designe: An interactive approach. Applied Social Research Method Series,4.
McCarth, M. (1990). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mereer. N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongest teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Nunan, D. (1997). Hidden voices: Insiders perspectives on classroom interaction. In K. Bailey, & D, Nunan, Voices from language classroont. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nystrand, M.. Gammoran. A.. Kachur. R., & Prendergast. C. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the english classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 17 tahun 2010. Tentang Pengelolaan dan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. (n.d.). Retrieved july 30, 2012, from http://dikdas.kemdikbud.go.id
Permendiknas Nomor 78/2009 tentang Penvelenggaraan Sekolah Rintisan Bertaraf Internasional. (n.d.). Retrieved July' 30, 2012- from http://dikdas.kemendi kbud-go.id
Pierson. J. L. (2005). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. Austin: The University of Texas.
Prabhu, N. S. (1992). The dynamics of the language lesson. iE,sOt- Quarterlr. 26 (21)-225-241.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:
Google ScholarThe Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI
