The influence of classroom based assessment and communicative approach in teaching-learning English for Indonesian learners

Idaryani Idaryani

Abstract


Indonesia is archipelago country and consists of hundreds different ethnic groups who speak more than seven hundred vernacular languages. Generally, Indonesian people are bilingual. They speak vernacular languages as their mother tongues and Bahasa Indonesia as means of  communication among different ethnic groups.  English is spoken as additional or foreign language. Since English is not means of communication for learners in their daily life, it will be very challenging for them in learning process moreover English is only learnt as prerequisite subject in many schools. It is believed that the implementation of Classroom Based Assessment (CBA) methods  and communicative language teaching (CLT) in teaching-learning will encourage students in learning English. It is also expected that the method will enable the students to be more engaged during classroom activities. Since the assessment methods will evaluate and assess all learners’ performances. The implementation of CBA and communicative approach of teaching is also expected to make learning English more interesting for learner so the learner will be aware that learning English can be as a fun activities. Communicative approach will enable students to be more active and enable them to do more interesting activities through speaking rather than sitting and listening to the teachers. The activities such as presentation, role play, and storytelling about attractive topics are expected to be more interested for students in teaching-learning process.


Keywords


communicative approach, teaching-learning, assessment, classroom activities

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th edn), chap. 1. Bristol, UK: Multilingual matters.

Leung, C. (2005). Classroom teacher assessment of second language development: Construct as practice. In E. Hinkle (ed), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 869-888).

Marwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Knight, P 2001, ‘The development of EFL methodology, ‘in Candlin, N.C & Mercer, N (ed), ‘English language teaching in its social contexts: A reader, Routledge, London, chp 8.

Harmer, J 2007, ‘Teaching language skills,’ The practice of English language teaching, 4th edn, Pearson Education, Harlow.

McPherson, P & Murray, DE. 2003, ‘Introduction’ Communication on the net, NCELTR,’ Syndey, pp. 1-5. In Pedagogy in the globalised language classroom, Readings, Deakin University, Victoria.

Van Lier, L 2000, ’From input to affordance: social –interactive learning from an ecological perspective’, in JP lantolf (ed), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, Oxford University Press, pp. 245-59. In pedagogy in the globalised language classroom, Readings, Deakin University, Victoria.

Ko, J, Schallert, D & Walters, K, 2003,’Rethinking scaffolding; examining negotiation of meaning in an ESL storytelling task’, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 37, (2), pp. 303-24. In pedagogy in the globalised language classroom, Readings, Deakin University, Victoria.

Rea-Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror mirror on the wall: identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language testing, 18 (4), pp. 429-462. Retrieved August 24, 2010, from the Sage Premier database.

Hill, K., & Mcnamara, T. (2001). Developing a comprehensive, Empirically based Research framework for Classroom-based assessment. Language Testing, 29 (3) pp. 395–420. Sage, DOI: 10.1177/0265532211428317.

Dornyei, Z. (2000). L2 motivation and the social context. Teaching and researching motivation (pp. 65-100). New York: Longman. In Learning an additional language, Study Guide and Readings. Victoria: Deakin University.

Kamyab, G., & Goleobiowski, Z. (2010). What should language teachers know about language. Topic 1.Linguistic for language teaching, Study Guide and Readings. Victoria: Deakin University.

Nunan, D., & Lamb., C. (2001). Managing the learning process. In Hall. D,.R. & Hewings, N (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching chap. Chap. 2, p. 28-33, Chap.13, p. 160. London and New York in associated with Mcquarie university and the open university: Routledge.

Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Goergetown University Press. pp. 26-37.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang



This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI