MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ‘GRAMMAR’ MAHASISWA JURUSAN BAHASA INGGRIS FBS UNP SECARA LISAN DAN TULISAN

Amri Isyam(1), Yetty Zainil(2),
(1) FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2017 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v4i1.7389

Full Text:    Language : id

Abstract


English Department Students as EFL learners must be able to use correct grammar of English well either in oral or written form; nevertheless, based on a prelimenary observation many of the English Department Students of Faculty of Languages, Letters and Arts of State University of Padang committed grammatical deviations when they communicated in English. This article aims at describing the action research about using OHP/LCDP, Role Plays/Language Games, and written exercises as the efforts to improve Grammatical Ability of the English Department Students. The research was carried out in two cycles, and the subjects were a class of education program consisting of thirty students, who were taking Structure 2 at that time. The findings of the research showed that using OHP/LCDP as media of teaching, Role Play/Language Games as oral exercises, and asking the subjects to do two kinds of written exercises (homework from their handbook as usual and their own sentences/paragraphs as assignments) in teaching Structure 2 communicatively improved the students’ grammatical ability either in oral or written forms much more significantly. Their grammatically-oral ability increased by 14.5 points/73.5% (from 21.8 to 36.3) whereas their grammatically-written ability increased by 13.1 points/82.3% (from 19.1 to 32.2) on the average. Thus, the research questions were answered positively, and the hyphotheses were proven.

Keywords


OHP/LCDP, role play, language game, and ‘tugas tulisan tersruktur

References


Collerson, J. 1995. English Grammar: A Functional Approach. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association.

Ellis, R.1984. Second Language Development. Oxford : Pergamon Press.

Emmit, M. dan J. Pollock. 1992. Language Learning : An Introduction to Teaching. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Fotos, S. dan R. Ellis. 1991. ‘Communicating about Grammar: A Task Based Approach’ dalam TESOL. Quarterly. Vol. 25. No.4, pp. 618-623.

Francis, N. W.1967. The English Language. London: The English Universities Press Limited.

Khatib, Y. K. 2000. ‘Upaya Meningkatkan Penguasaan 'Grammar' Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa Inggris FBSS-UNP dengan Pendekatan Komunikatif.’ Laporan Penelitian. Padang: Jurusan Bahasa Inggris FBSS-UNP.

Kohonen, V., R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikkonen, and J. Lehtovaara. 2001. Experiential Learning in Foreign Language Education. London: Longman.

Krashen, S. D.1983. Principles in Second Language Acquisition. London: A Wheatan & Co Ltd, Exater.

Larsen-Freeman, D. 1986. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Hong Kong: OUP.

Larsen-Freeman, D. 2003. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Canada: Thompson Heinle.

Lee, W.R. 1982. Language Teaching Games and Contests. London: Oxford University Press.

Littlewood, W. 1983. Communicaative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M.1990. ‘Maturational constrains on language learning’ dalam Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 63-82.

Lubis, Y. 1988. Developing Communicative Proficiency in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Class. Jakarta: Proyek PLPTK.

Madya, S.1994. Panduan Penelitian Tindakan. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian IKIP Yogyakarta.

Nunan, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology. London: Prentice Hall International Ltd.

Richards, J. 1990. The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss.

Roberts, P. 1962. English Sentences. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Scovel, T. 2001. Learning New Languages: A Guide to Second Language Acquisition. Scarborough, Ontario: Newbury House.

Strang, B. M. H. 1978. Modern English Structure. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.

Syarif, H. 1989. ‘Pengaruh Pendekatan Komunikatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah 'Structure' Mahasiswa D3 Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FPBS-IKIP Padang’. Air Tawar: Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FPBS-IKIP Padang.

Werner, P. K. 1985. Mosaic I: A Content-Based Grammar. New York: Random House, Inc.

Werner, P. K., and J. P. Nelson. 1985. Mosaic II: A Content-Based Grammar. New York Random House Inc.

Werner, Patricia K., and Lou Spaventa. 2002. Mosaic I: Grammar. (4-th Edition/International Edition) New York: McGraw-Hill Contemporary.

White, Lydia. 1987. ‘Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence’ dalam Applied Linguistics 8: 95-110.

White, Lydia. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Woodward, Tessa. 1991. Models and Metaphors in Language Teaching Training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 2034 times
 PDF Downloaded : 628 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.