1. Home
  2. Vol 6, No 1 (2017)
  3. Putri

Hubungan Kontrol Diri dengan Perilaku Membolos Siswa

Megawati Silvia Putri(1), Daharnis Daharnis(2), Zikra Zikra(3),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2017 Konselor

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/02017616441-0-00

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The purpose of this research to describe self control and truant behavior students and examine the relationship between self control with the behavior of truant students. This research applied quantitative method and descriptive correlational design, with a sample of 234 students,  that drawn by Propotional Stratified Random Sampling technique. The instrument of this research was a scale of Likert model. Hypothesis testing of research using the formula Pearson Product Moment Correlation with SPSS for mindows release 20.00. The results showed: (1) on average,  the truant behavior of class X and XI SMA Negeri 7 Padang was 19.86 hours of lessons in 2 months, (2) on average,  class X and XI SMA Negeri 7 Padang self control was 108.24 at the high category, (3) there was significant negative of self-control with truant behavior of students, with a correlation coefficient -0.289  significance level 0.000, which is smaller than 0.05. This research can be used as an analysis of the needs of students for the teacher of guidance and counseling for the manufacture of guidance and counseling services programs at SMA Negeri 7 Padang.

Keywords


Self-Control, Truant Behavioral

References


Ali Imron. (2012). Manajemen Peserta Didik BerbasisSekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

B. R. Hergenhahn dan Mattew H. Olson. (2012). Teori Belajar (edisi ketujuh). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2002). Research design and methods: A process approach. McGraw-Hill.

Fitri Astria. (2014). Kontrol Diri Siswa dalam Hubungan Sosial di Sekolah dan Implikasinya Terhadap Layanan Bimbingan dan Konseling. Skripsi. Padang: BK FIP UNP.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

J. P. Chaplin. (2011). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. (Terjemahan Kartini Kartono). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Jeane Ellis Ormrud. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Erlangga

John W. Santrock. (2003). Adolescence. (Terjemahan Oleh Shinti b Adelar dan Sherly Saragih). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ken Reid. (2002). Truancy Short and Long-Tearm Solution. New York: Taylor dan Prancis Group.

M. Nur Ghufron dan Rini Risnawati. (2010). Teori-Teori Psikologi. Jakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Mugenda, O. M. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. African Centre for Technology Studies.

Murtonen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Difficulties experienced by education and sociology students in quantitative methods courses. Studies in Higher education, 28(2), 171-185.

Nurfitri Anggun Sari. (2012). Hubungan Antara Pengalaman Korban Bullying dengan Perilaku Membolos Pada Siswa SMK Taman Siswa Padang. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Padang: BK FIP UNP.

Oemar Hamalik. (2002). Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Salma Abdul Kadir. (2013). Meminimalkan Perilaku Membolos Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 8 Gorontalo Melalui Layanan Bimbingan Kelompok. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Gorontalo: FIP UNG.

Slameto. (1995). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Supriyo. (2008). Studi Kasus Bimbingan dan Konseling. Semarang: Nieuw Setapa

Surya Manggala Elani. (2015). Hubungan Kontrol Diri Dengan Disiplin Siswa di Sekolah. Skripsi. Padang: BK FIP UNP.

Syamsul Bachri Thalib. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan Berbasis Analisis Empiris Aplikatif. Jakarta: Kencana.

The Liang Gie. (1995). Cara Belajar yang Efisien. Yogyakarta: Liberty.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 4708 times
 PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Downloaded : 2666 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Konselor