Accountability of Layanan Dasar by school counselor in junior high school in East Jakarta on school principals perspective

Aip Badrujaman(1), Meithy Intan Rukia Luawo(2), Wening Cahyawulan(3),
(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Jakarta  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2018 Aip Badrujaman, Meithy Intan Rukia Luawo, Wening Cahyawulan

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/020187410740-0-00

Full Text:    Language : id

Abstract


The objective of this research is to describe of the accountability of Layanan Dasar school counselor on school principals’ perspective. The study used descriptive study methods, used sampling technique was convenience sampling with a sample of 33 school principals, and instruments used were Mixed Standard Scale for Evaluating Student Behavior and analysis data used descriptive. The results of the study show that overall the level of accountability of guidance and counseling programs in schools in East Jakarta is at a low level (49%). Second, achievements based on indicators are not significantly different (10%). Third, the highest indicator of accountability is the responsibility, while the lowest indicator is the feedback mechanism. Fourth, each school falls into the low category of 50%, medium 30%, and high 20%. Based on the results there needs to be an effort to improve the accountability of the guidance and counseling program and base of feedback mechanism indicators, teacher Guidance and counseling must create a mechanism by which the principal can submit input.


Keywords


layanan dasar, akuntabilitas, BK, kepala sekolah

References


Astramovich, R.L. (2007). Program evaluation: The accuntability bridge model for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 85(2), 162-172.

Badrujaman, A. (2011). Evaluasi program bimbingan konseling. Jakarta:Indeks.

Dahir, C.A. &Stone, C.B. (2009). School counselor accountability: The path to social justice and systemic change. Journal of Counseling & Development, 87(1), 12-20.

Eschenauer, R. & Chen-Hayes, S.F. (2005). The transformative individual school counseling model: an accountability model for urban school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 8(3), 244.

Gysbers, N.C. (2004). Comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: The evolution of accountability. Profesional School Counseling, 8(1), 1-14.

Isaac, M.L. (2003). Data-driven decision making: The engine of accountability.Profesional School Counseling, 6(4), 288-295.

Perera-Diltz, D.M. & Mason, K.L. (2010).An Exploration of Accountability Practices of School Counselors: A National Study. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory & Research, 38(1), 52-70.

Ryan


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 599 times
 PDF Downloaded : 111 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Aip Badrujaman, Meithy Intan Rukia Luawo, Wening Cahyawulan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.