This study aims to describe the level of validity of the evaluation instruments contained in the electronic school textbook (BSE) of Indonesian language textbooks for class IX in the 2019/2020 academic year. This research uses a qualitative approach. Determination of the sample in this study was conducted purposively, namely sampling by determining specific characteristics that are in accordance with the objectives of the study so that it is expected to answer the research problem. The sample in this study is in the form of an experimental report evaluation instrument. The validity data of the evaluation instruments collected included the material, construction, and language domains. The percentage of validity level is done by dividing the number of valid or invalid instruments by the number of validity criteria then multiplied by one hundred. Based on the research that has been done it can be known, that the evaluation instrument about writing a trial report has not fully fulfilled the validity element. The validity level of the evaluation instrument from the material domain is 25%, the construction realm is 68%, and the validity from the realm of language is 92%. The results of this study can be used as one of the foundations for evaluating and improving the quality of BSE Indonesian textbooks.

kevaliditasan, instrument, evaluasi

Agus Trianto, Titik Harsiati, & E. K. (2018). Bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Revi). Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemendikbud.

Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2018). Research in social and administrative pharmacy evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, (xxxx), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066

Arias, D., Chen, T. F., & Moles, R. J. (2019). Utilising a content analysis approach to assess measurement tools used in the management of general feverish illness in children. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.10.010

Bannur, F. M., Akmar, S., Abidin, Z., & Jamil, A. (2015). A validation process of ESP testing using Weir’s socio cognitive framework (2005). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202(December 2014), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.223

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. United States of America: Longman.

Clara, A., Scheuer, N., Ignacio, J., Culturales, E., Vinculado, G., Estudios, P. De, … Centro, C. S. (2020). Elementary school children â€TM s conceptions of teaching and learning to write as intentional activities. Learning and Instruction, 65(September 2019), 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101249

Ernst, B., & Steinhauser, M. (2015). Brain and cognition effects of invalid feedback on learning and feedback-related brain activity in decision-making. Brain and Cognition, 99, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.07.006

Feistauer, D., & Richter, T. (2018). Studies in educational evaluation validity of students ’ evaluations of teaching : Biasing e ff ects of likability and prior subject interest, 59(January), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.009

He, W. & X. B. (2020). Perspective-shifting are helpful for children in Chinese passive sentence comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103059

Huang, P. (2019). Learning , Culture and social interaction textbook interaction : A study of the language and cultural contextualisation of English learning textbooks. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(December 2018), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.006

Johnson, Elaine B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What is and why it’s here to stay. California: Corwin Press, Inc

Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. Kurikulum 2013 sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP)/ Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs) (2013). Jakarta.

Lee, I., Mak, P., Yuan, R. E., Chinese, T., & Kong, H. (2019). Studies in educational evaluation assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms : An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62(April), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.012

Mutiarazani, E., & Amroh, I. W. (2018). Kondisi buku bahasa Indonesia kelas X :, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.hastawiyata.2018.001.02.04

Nurgiantoro, Burhan. 2014. Penilaian pembelajaran bahasa berbasis kompetensi, Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta

Pangestika, D. N., Andayani, A., & Suhita, R. (2017). Kajian buku teks bahasa Indonesia tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama. BASASTRA, 5(2), 31-48.

Pop, C., & Khampirat, B. (2019). Studies in educational evaluation self-assessment instrument to measure the competencies of Namibian graduates : Testing of validity and reliability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60(December 2018), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.004

Publishers, C. (2018). Language education & assessment then and now : Themes in language assessment Research, 1(1), 3–8.

Rahayu, M. L. (2015). Kajian instrumen penilaian pada buku teks bahasa Indonesia kelas Vii Kurikulum 2013 Terbitan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Safi’i, I. (2018). Nilai-nilai pendidikan karakter dalam alat evaluasi bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan KarakterPendidikan, VIII(1), 74–83.

Supardi. (2015). Penilaian autentik pembelajaran afektif, kognitif, dan psikomotor. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.

Wools, S., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Be, A. A. (2016). Studies in educational evaluation, 48, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.11.001

Yulianti, U. H. (2011). Analisis perbandingan kualitas buku teks BSE bahasa Indonesia untuk SMP Kelas VII Karya Ratna Susanti, Atikah Anindyarini-Sri Ningsih, dan Maryati-Sutopo: Kajian Isi, Penyajian, dan Bahasa (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang).

Yuniarti, N. & S. (2016). Validitas konstrak instrumen evaluasi outcome Lembaga Pendidikan Guru Vokasional. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), (221-233). Retrieved from http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep