Bagian yang Hilang dalam Pembicaraan Akademisi Indonesia tentang Sastra Siber

Dipa Nugraha; Suyitno Suyitno

doi:10.24036/komposisi.v21i1.108473

Bagian yang Hilang dalam Pembicaraan Akademisi Indonesia tentang Sastra Siber

Dipa Nugraha⁽¹⁾, Suyitno Suyitno⁽²⁾,
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2020 Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/komposisi.v21i1.108473

Full Text:

Language : id

Abstract

There is a missing subject in the conversations on Indonesian cyberliterature. This case study research identifies academic conversations on cyberliterature in Indonesia. Literature review using articles written by Indonesian academia is used to build an assumption on the discursive development of cyberliterature in Indonesia which misses electronic literature. The assumption is then verified with the data collected from one-shot method survey. The survey using two simple questions targeted Indonesian lecturers from several universities in Java, Sumatera, and Kalimantan. Qualitative content analysis is used to describe our findings. The analysis reveals that Indonesian academia conversations on cyberliterature only focus on digital publishing and the freedom of expression offers by the presence of the internet. The conversations on cyberliterature by Indonesian academia have not really covered electronic literature and how it may develop in the Indonesian literary context.

Keywords

cyberliterature, digital publishing, digital literature, electronic literature

References

Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore & London: JHU Press.

Altun, A. (2003). Understanding hypertext in the context of reading on the web: Language learners’ experience. Current Issues in Education, 6.

Baetens, J., & Van Looy, J. (2008). E-poetry between image and performance: A cultural analysis. Journal of E-Media Studies, 1(1), 1–18.

Becker, H. S. (2008). Art worlds: updated and expanded. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Bouchardon, S. (2017). Towards a tension-based definition of Digital Literature. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 2(1).

de Zepetnek, S. T. (1998). Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.

Flores, L. (2014). Digital Poetry. In M.-L. Ryan, L. Emerson, & B. J. Robertson (Eds.), The Johns Hopkins guide to digital media. Baltimore: JHU Press.

Glazier, L. P. (2001). Digital poetics: the making of e-poetries. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

Grigar, D. (2016). Electronic Literature: Where Is It? Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, 227.

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Heckman, D., & O’Sullivan, J. (2018). Electronic literature: contexts and poetics. Literary Studies in a Digital Age. https://doi.org/10.1632/lsda.2018.14

Hidayat, A. (2008). Sastra Cyber: Alternatif Komunikasi antara Karya Sastra dan Masyarakat Pembaca. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 2(2), 260–268.

Hockx, M. (2005). Virtual Chinese literature: A comparative case study of online poetry communities. The China Quarterly, 183, 670–691.

Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2).

Johns, A. H. (1959). Indonesian literature and the social upheaval. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 13(4), 293–303.

Kim, A. (2003). The geography of cyberliterature in Korea. In R. C. Lee & S. L. C. Wong (Eds.), Asian America. Net: ethnicity, nationalism, and cyberspace (pp. 1–14). NY & London: Routledge.

Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–30. Institut für Qualitative Forschung.

Koskimaa, R. (2007). Cybertext Challenge: Teaching literature in the digital world. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 6(2), 169–185.

Landow, G. P. (1991). HyperText: the convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology (parallax: re-visions of culture and society series). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mahayana, M. (2016). Peta sastra Indonesia mutakhir. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kesusasteraan Indonesia Mutakhir, 1–11. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Mahayana, M. (2017, April 22). Sastra(wan) Generasi Facebook. Kompas, p. 24. Retrieved from https://kompas.id/baca/x/akhir-pekan/2017/04/22/sastrawan-generasi-facebook/

Mangen, A., & Van der Weel, A. (2017). Why don’t we read hypertext novels? Convergence, 23(2), 166–181.

Mawardi, A. B. (2018). Komodifikasi sastra cyber Wattpad pada penerbit indie. Sabda: Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan, 13(1), 77–82.

Merawati, F., & Suwartini, I. (2019). The discourse of cyber literature in Indonesia. 2nd Workshop on Language, Literature and Society for Education. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2018.2282796

Nursalam. (2017). Eksistensi sastra online dalam kesusastraan Indonesia dengan tinjauan sosiologi sastra. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Sastra, Bahasa, Dan Budaya 2017: Sastra, Bahasa, Budaya, Dan Pengajarannya Di Era Digital, 111–117. Malang: Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang.

O’Sullivan, J. (2019). Towards a Digital Poetics: Electronic Literature & Literary Games. Springer.

Putra, D. (2011). A literary mirror; Balinese reflections on modernity and identity in the twentieth century. KITLV Press.

Ratih, K., Novi, A., & Titik, M. (2014). Realitas sosial dan representasi fiksimini dalam tinjauan sosiologi sastra. Publika Budaya, 2(1), 50–57.

Rejo, U. (2014). Memosisikan Sastra Siber Sebagai Lahan Baru dalam Penelitian Sastra Mutakhir di Indonesia. Paramasastra, 1(2).

Ridder, H.-G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281–305.

Roekminto, F. S. (2005). Perlukah dan Mungkinkah Sastra di Internet? Proceeding, Seminar Nasional PESAT 2005. Universitas Gunadarma.

Rokib, M. (2019, December). The Polemics of Digital Literature in Indonesia: Trends, Patterns, and Approaches within Academic Discussion BT - Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Conference (SoSHEC 2019). 54–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-19.2019.63

Salmerón, L., Cañas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 171–191.

Septriani, H. (2016). Fenomena sastra cyber: sebuah kemajuan atau kemunduran? Seminar Nasional Sosiologi Sastra. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Sukri, M. F. (2018). Bahasa Ruang Ruang Puitik. Yogyakarta: Basabasi.

Supriatin, Y. M. (2012). Kritik Sastra Cyber. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 11(25), 47–54.

Suraja, C. N. (2019). Puisi digital (kajian reproduksi Antologi Puisi Digital Cyberpuitika - 2002). Retrieved from sainspuisi.com website: https://sainspuisi.com/2019/09/05/puisi-digital-kajian-reproduksi-antologi-puisi-digital-cyberpuitika-2002/

Swiss, T. (1996). Music and noise: Marketing hypertexts. Postmodern Culture: Journal of Interdisciplinary Thought on Contemporary Cultures, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.1996.0045

Teeuw, A. (1972). The impact of Balai Pustaka on modern Indonesian literature. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 35(1), 111–127.

Tillewein, B. (2013). New media objects: the future of electronic literature and its influence on print stylistics. DePaul University.

Tiwon, S. (1992). Ordinary songs: Chairil Anwar and traditional poetics. Indonesia Circle. School of Oriental & African Studies. Newsletter, 20(58), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03062849208729782

Viires, P. (2005). Literature in cyberspace. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, (29), 153–174.

Wicaksono, A. (2017). Pengkajian Prosa Fiksi (edisi revisi). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Garudhawaca.

Zellweger, P. T., Mangen, A., & Newman, P. (2002). Reading and writing fluid hypertext narratives. Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 45–54.