Effectiveness of Creative Thinking Instruments Through Discovery Learning Models in Improving Creative Thinking Skills

Ai Nur Solihat(1), Dadang Dahlan(2), Kusnendi Kusnendi(3), Budi Susetyo(4),
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia  Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/011282030

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the need, feasibility, and effectiveness of creative thinking instruments in economic learning. The study procedures were carried out using Research and Development (R&D) method, which comprised various stages, including planning, development, feasibility testing, and instrument implementation. Subsequently, a needs analysis was performed by distributing questionnaires and conducting interviews with economics subject teachers. Content validity testing was also carried out through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with nine experts in economics learning, followed by analysis using Aiken Validity Index (Aiken V-Index). Reliability analysis was performed using KR20 through limited tests on 32 class X students at SMAN 4 Bandung City. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the feasibility of the question items. To test the instrument's effectiveness, a quasi-experiment with the one-group pretest-posttest design was conducted on 37 students in class X at SMAN 1 Tasikmalaya City. The results showed that 70.8% of economics teachers expressed a demand for the development of creative thinking instruments. Among the 60 items developed, 47 were declared feasible based on CFA results. In addition, a total of 47 items were implemented through the discovery learning model. The results of hypothesis testing showed that the discovery learning model using the developed instrument proved effective in improving students' creative thinking skills in economics.

Keywords


Aiken, Creative Thinking, Economic Learning, Torrance Test Creative Thinking, Discovery Learning.

References


Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2020). What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000256

Alabbasi, A. M. A., Paek, S. H., Kim, D., & Cramond, B. (2022). What do educators need to know about the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000385

An Nabil, N. R., Wulandari, I., Yamtinah, S., Ariani, S. R. D., & Ulfa, M. (2022). Analisis Indeks Aiken untuk Mengetahui Validitas Isi Instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Berbasis Konteks Sains Kimia. Paedagogia, 25(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.20961/paedagogia.v25i2.64566

Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom Assessment. In Classroom Assessment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607140

Anwar, C. (2017). Teori-Teori Pendidikan Klasik Hingga Kontemporer. IRCiSoD.

Arends, R. I. (2014). Learning to Teach (Tenth Edition). In McGraw-Hill Education: Vol. Tenth Edit.

Benedek, M., Nordtvedt, N., Jauk, E., Koschmieder, C., Pretsch, J., Krammer, G., & Neubauer, A. C. (2016). Assessment of creativity evaluation skills: A psychometric investigation in prospective teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.007

Budiwati, Neti; Permana, L. (2010). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Ekonomi (Pertama). Laboratorium Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Koperasi UPI.

Cecil R. Reynolds; Robert T. Brown. (1989). Hanbook of Creativity. Plenum Press.

Chaiyama, N. (2019). The development of blended leaning model by using active learning activity to develop learning skills in 21st century. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(12), 880–886. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.12.1321

Danardono; Kristiyanto, Agus; Purnama, Sapta Kunta; Tomoliyus; Ariani, N. (2022). Reactive Agility Instruments in Karate Kumite: Aiken Validity. 10(3), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2022.100311

Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (2018). Buku pengangan pembelajaran beroriantasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi.

Do, H. N., Do, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023). How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach. Heliyon, 9(12), e22862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22862

Etistika Yuni Wijaya, Dwi Agus Sudjimat, & Amat Nyoto. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1, 263–278.

Fatmawati, B., Jannah, B. M., & Sasmita, M. (2022). Students’ Creative Thinking Ability Through Creative Problem Solving based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 8(4), 2384–2388. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1846

Fraenkel, Jack R, N. E. W. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Seventh Ed). McGraw-Hill.

Grajzel, K., Dumas, D., & Acar, S. (2022). Are the Verbal TTCT Forms Actually Interchangeable? Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(4), 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.556

Guilford, J. . (1966). Measurement and Creativity. Theory into Practice, 5(4), 186–189.

Kusnendi, & Ciptagustia, A. (2023). Analisis Model Pengukuran Dan Struktural Dalam Penelitian Manajemen dan Bisnis. UPI Press.

Lee, K.-H., Moon, S.-J., & Noh, J.-W. (2021). Integration of mathematical creativity into everyday classes through dynamics between divergent and convergent thinking. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-021-01307-5

Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of Economics: a Guided Tour. In Cengage (Tenth Edit). HARVARD UNIVERSITY.

Meredith D. Gall, Joyce P. Gall, W. R. B. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction.

Muhajir, S. N., Utari, S., & Suwarma, I. R. (2019). How to develop test for measure critical and creative thinking skills of the 21st century skills in POPBL? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032051

Mumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook Organozational Creativity. Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier.

Ojugo, A. A., & Yoro, R. E. (2021). Extending the three-tier constructivist learning model for alternative delivery: Ahead the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 21(3), 1673–1682. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i3.pp1673-1682

Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.009

Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2013). Psychology for the Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855171

Reksaningrum, M., & Muljani, S. (2022). Pembelajaran Berkarakteristik Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad 21 pada Materi Transformasi Geometri dengan Model Pembelajaran discovery Learning di SMK Bina Nusa Slawi Kabupaten Tegal. Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.24905/cakrawala.vi0.175

Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/REID.V2I2.11029

Salam, Sunarso, A., & Ridlo, S. (2023). The Influence of Discovery Learning Model on Motivation, Creative Thinking Ability, and Students’ Learning Outcomes in Science Education for Grade V Elementary School. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(7), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230773

Silvia, P. J. (2008). Discernment and Creativity: How Well Can People Identify Their Most Creative Ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.139

Sofya, R. (2018). Implementasi Flip Learning Strategi Meningkatkan Higher Order Thinking Mahasiswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi, 8(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.24036/01104510

Suhonosov, A. P., Karneev, R. C., Kurganova, E. A., & Listick, E. M. (2021). The relationship between creative leadership and creative thinking in primary school students. 117, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1051/SHSCONF/202111702003

Susetyo, B. (2015). Prosedur Penyusunan dan Analisis Tes untuk Penilaian Hasil Belajar Bidang Kognitif. In Anna (Ed.), Bandung: Refika Aditama. PT. Refika Aditama. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.020%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.08.019%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2016.12.015%0Ahttps://ejournal.poltektegal.ac.id/index.php/siklus/article/view/298%0Ahttp://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.

Taar, J., & Palojoki, P. (2022). Applying interthinking for learning 21st-century skills in home economics education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 33(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100615

Tanjung, Y. I., Wulandari, T., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., & Ahda, Y. (2023). Development analysis of creative thinking test instruments on natural science materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v12i1.43340

Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual (Research Edition). In Null: Vol. null (p. null). Personnel Press.

Torrance, E. P. (2012). Guiding Creative Talent. Literary Licensing LLC.

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Measuring the levels of 21st-century digital skills among professionals working within the creative industries: A performance-based approach. Poetics, 81(January), 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101434

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling Applications Using Mplus Second Edition. Wiley.

Wanot, B., & Wanot, W. (2019). Creativity in psychological and scientific terms. personality determinants of creativity. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 36(5), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.23856/3613

Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(January), 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631

Yarbrough, N. D. (2016). Assessment of Creative Thinking Across Cultures Using the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT): Translation and Validity Issues. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162571

Yerimadesi, Y., Warlinda, Y. A., Hardeli, H., & Andromeda, A. (2022). Implementation of Guided Discovery Learning Model with SETS Approach Assisted by Chemistry E-Module to Improve Creative Thinking Skills of Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1151–1157. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1522.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 63 times
 PDF Downloaded : 23 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.