Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi is a peer-reviewed journal and scientific journal devoted to the publication of original papers published by Universitas Negeri Padang. Since 2018, this journal has become an open-access peer-reviewed online journal of economics and education studies published by Universitas Negeri Padang. This journal is published twice a year in an online version.

Articles can be from any of the following areas:

  • Learning innovations in economics
  • Improving learning materials in economics
  • Teaching and learning strategies in economics
  • Educational evaluations in the fields of economics and education,
  • Economics, business and accounting,
  • Office administration,
  • Cooperative studies. 

Section Policies


  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees by double blind peer review for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required) a third peer-reviewer is needed to give critical comments to the submitted manuscript.The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 8 weeks. Please notice that because of the great number of submissions that JIPE has received during the last few months the duration of the review process can be up to 3 months.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to all articles on the principle that making research freely available to the public; supports a greater global exchange of knowledge; and invaluable way to maximize the visibility and impact of research, especially the economics and education field. This means:

  1. Everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles published in JIPE Journal
  2. Everyone is free to re-use the published material if proper accreditation/citation of the original publication is given;
  3. Open an opportunity for potential benefits for society, this can improve the research profile of the author(s).

Important Note: some articles (especially Reviews) may contain figures, tables, or text taken from other publications, for which the Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi does not hold the copyright or the right to re-license the published material. Please note that you should inquire with the original copyright holder (usually the original publisher or authors), whether or not this material can be re-used.


This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics of JIPE

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher UniversitasNegeri Padang. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical JIPE for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JIPE Journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.

UniversitasNegeri Padang (UNP) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the UNP and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editors of the JIPE Journal are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Section Policies


 Open Submissions


Peer Reviewed

Back Pages

 Open Submissions


Peer Reviewed

Journal Indexing and Abstracting

Journal History

JIPE is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal published by Universitas Negeri Padang in collaboration with Aliansi Pendidik dan Praktisi Bisnis Indonesia (APSIBI) and Aliansi Profesi Pendidik Akuntansi Indonesia (APRODIKSI). The first issue was published on 2012 (prints). Since the first publication, it has changed several times in term of journal management and policy

  • 2012, the first issue was published in print form. The ISSN Print was issued on, 2012
  • JIPE has been online since 2018.
  • On Vol 9, No 2 October 2018, the e- ISSN was issued by LIPI
  • Before 2018 all the editorial process of JIPE was done offline. But at the end of 2019, the management agreed to do online editorial process.
  • Since Oktober 2018, all articles must be use the new template of JIPE
  • In 2019, JIPE collaborated with Aliansi Pendidik dan Praktisi Bisnis Indonesia (APSIBI) and Aliansi Profesi Pendidik Akuntansi Indonesia (APRODIKSI)
  • In January 2020, Jipe received accreditation on Sinta 4.
  • In January 2020, Jipe published a new template.
  • Since August 2020, again JIPE published a new template for some adjustment.
  • Since December 2020, Jipe received accreditation on Sinta 3.

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are not required to pay an Article Submission Fee.

Article Publication for members of Faculty Economics of Universitas Negeri Padang: 0.00 (IDR)

Article Publication for national and international author: 750,000.00 (IDR)

The APC is Rp750,000.00 (Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Rupiah/ Tujuh Ratus Lima Puluh Ribu Rupiah) and the authors need to wire transfer to our bank account. 

Bank Name: Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI)

Account Name: Jurnal inovasi pend ekonomi
Account No: 7222561188

Please email your wire transfer receipt to jipe.feunp@gmail.com

The journal will be freely available to all readers with worldwide visibility and coverage.


Screening For Plagiarism

In publishing, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi strongly against any case of plagiarism on its own merits. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi commits to deterring plagiarism.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited.

The manuscript that submitted into this journal will be screened for plagiarism using Turnitin

Publication Frequency

This journal published twice a year.