EVALUASI PENULISAN ABSTRAK HASIL PENELITIAN  DOSEN UNIVERSITAS LANCANG KUNING

Nining Sudiar; Fiqru Mafar; Rosman H.

doi:10.24036/jh.v15i1.6414

EVALUASI PENULISAN ABSTRAK HASIL PENELITIAN DOSEN UNIVERSITAS LANCANG KUNING

Nining Sudiar⁽¹⁾, Fiqru Mafar⁽²⁾, Rosman H.⁽³⁾,
(1)

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Lancang Kuning Pekanbaru Jl. Yos Sudarso Km. 08, Kec. Rumbai, Kota Pekanbaru, Riau 28266, Indonesia

Indonesia
(3) Universitas Lancang Kuning Pekanbaru Jl. Yos Sudarso Km. 08, Kec. Rumbai, Kota Pekanbaru, Riau 28266, Indonesia

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2016 Humanus

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jh.v15i1.6414

Full Text:

Language : id

Abstract

THE EVALUATION OF ABSTRACT FOR RESEARCH REPORTS WRITTEN BY LECTURERS OF LANCANG KUNING UNIVERSITY

Abstract is an important part in the writing of research reports. However, not all authors to understand the elements of abstract writing research reports. This study aimed to evaluate the writing of abstract research professor at the University Lancang Kuning. The method used in this research is quantitative method to see the abstract research faculty produced between the years 2014-2015. The assessment is done by assessing the consistency of the faculty in writing to follow the provisions of abstract research based Handbook of Research and Community Services Lancang Kuning University Edition III. Results of the study will be used as the evaluation results at the same time improving the quality of faculty research Unilak. The results showed that there is still a lot abstract research reports Unilak lecturers who do not meet predetermined criteria abstract. Incompatibility is the most relevant number of words. A total of 59.38% abstracts of research reports lecturer exceed 200 words. This means there are many research reports abstract lecturer who still do not meet the criteria of the abstract that has been determined.

Keywords: abstract, research report, lecture, Unilak

Abstrak

Abstrak merupakan bagian penting dalam penulisan laporan penelitian. Namun, belum semua penulis memahami unsur-unsur penulisan abstrak laporan penelitian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian dosen Universitas Lancang Kuning. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif dengan melihat abstrak hasil penelitian dosen yang dihasilkan antara tahun 2014-2015. Pengkajian dilakukan dengan menilai konsistensi dosen dalam mengikuti ketentuan penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian berdasarkan Buku Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning Edisi III. Hasil penelitian nantinya dapat dijadikan sebagai evaluasi sekaligus peningkatan mutu hasil penelitian dosen Unilak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen Unilak yang belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan. Ketidaksesuaian terbanyak adalah terkait jumlah kata. Sebanyak 59,38% abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen melebihi 200 kata. Hal ini berarti masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen yang masih belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan.

Kata Kunci: Abstrak, Hasil Penelitian, Dosen, Unilak.

Keywords

Abstrak, Hasil Penelitian, Dosen, Unilak.

References

Feather, John dan Paul Sturges. 2003. International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. London: Routledge.

Floridi, L. 2010. Levels of abstraction and the Turing test. Kybernetes , 423-440.

Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning. 2014. Buku Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning Edisi III. Pekanbaru: Universitas Lancang Kuning.

Mortimer, M. 2007. Library Speak: a Glossary of terms in librarianship and information management. Texas: Total Recall.

Prytherch, R. 2005. Harrod’s Librarians’ Glossary and Reference Book: a directory of over 10,200 terms, organizations, projects and acronyms in the areas of information management, library science, publishing and archive management. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

Sternberg, Robert J. 2003. The Psychologist’s Companion: a Guide to scientific wrting for students and researchers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stevenson, J., & Collin, P. H. 2006. Dictionary of Information and Library Management. London: A & C Black Publisher.

Universitas Lancang Kuning. 2014. LPPM Unilak Naik Madya. Dipetik Agustus 11, 2015, dari Website Resmi Universitas Lancang Kuning: http://unilak.ac.id/web/detailberita/195

Universitas Lancang Kuning. 2015. Materi Sidang Pleno Komisi 1 Bidang Akademik. Tonggak Pencapaian Tahun 2015-2016 Menuju Unggul 2030 . Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia: Universitas Lancang kuning.