Scrutinizing Metadiscourse Markers in the Gossip Columns of Lambe Turah and Insert Live: A Corpus Linguistic Study

Lira Yusnidar(1), Prihantoro Prihantoro(2), Muhammad Hifni Sahila Rizqy(3), Mariah Anggraeni(4),
(1) Diponegoro University  Indonesia
(2) Diponegoro University  Indonesia
(3) Diponegoro University  Indonesia
(4) Diponegoro University  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2025 Prihantoro Prihantoro, Muhammad Hifni Sahila Rizqy, Lira Yusnidar, Mariah Anggraeni

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v24i1.131396

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The use of meta-discourse in academic spoken or written texts has been widely investigated. However, the existence of meta-discourse as a meaning-making in informal contexts such as gossip pages remains unaddressed. This present study investigates the frequency of word classes and the use of meta-discourse markers as the meaning-making practices in the gossip columns of Insert Live and Lambe Turah. The selection of these two online media platforms is grounded in their pragmatics and national coverage. The data collection of this research utilizes the corpus method. Data were gathered from Insert Live and Lambe Turah gossip columns.  In accordance with Hyland's theory (2005), the focus of this study is on comparing the word list frequency and functions of meta-discourse markers in the gossip columns in online media. The finding reveals that Insert Live tends to emphasize object-related elements, while Lambe Turah tends to underscore event-related aspects in gossip reporting. Besides, Insert Live tends to use meta-discourse markers in gossip columns to provide clarifications derived from informants, while Lambe Turah employs meta-discourse markers to steer readers’ opinions toward believing a particular issue by producing accusations using speculative language.

Keywords


Corpus Linguistics, Gossip Columns, Insert Live, Lambe Turah, Metadiscourse

References


Ahmed, S. (2011). “Analyzing Women’s Talk and Gossip between Two Female Friends”. Leading Undergraduate Work in English Studies 3: 1-14.

Aini, N., & Ekawati, R. (2022). Metadiscourse Markers in CNN Health News Articles. Suar Betang, 17(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v17i1.329

Aini, Q. (2021). Ekspresi bahasa politik dikalangan menteri: studi analisis talk show Mata Najwa “gono-gini kursi menteri”. HUMANIKA, 28(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v28i1.36491

Al-Rashady, F. (2012). “Determining The Role of Hedging Devices in The Political Discourse of Two American Presidential Debates in 2008”. TESOL Journal 7: 30-42.

Atmadi, T. (1985). Sistem Pers Indonesia. Gunung Agung.

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. (1999). Understanding and Using English Grammar Third Edition. New York: Pearson Education.

Bax, S., Nakatsuhara, F., & Waller, D. (2019). Researching L2 writers’ use of metadiscourse markers at intermediate and advanced levels. System, 83(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010

Biri, Y. (2017). Metadiscourse in Online Opinion Texts-Exploring Variation within a genre. MA Thesis, Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132491131.pdf.

Boer, K. M., Pratiwi, M. R., & Muna, N. (2020). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Generasi Milenial dan Pemerintah Terkait Covid-19 di Media Online. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v4i1.8277

Degaf, A., Wijana, I., & Poedjosoedarmo, S. (2019). Textual analysis on celebrity news in the online media. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 14(2), 249– 260. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v14i2.7428

Duruk, E. (2017). Analysis of Metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 1–9. www.jlls.org

Farnia, M., & Mohammadi, N. (2018). Cross-cultural analysis of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in persuasive local newspaper articles. Discourse and Interaction, 11(2), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-2-27

Foster, E. K. (2004). “Research on Gossip: Taxonomy, Methods, and Future Directions”. Journal of General Psychology 8 (2): 78-99.

Hardjanto, T. D. (2023). Hedging in Newspaper Headlines Written by Indonesian and American Writers. 10(2), 72–81.

Hasanah, U., & Wahyudi, R. (2016). Meaning-Making of Hedges in the Gossip Column of the Jakarta Post. Jurnal Humaniora, 27(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v27i2.8717

Hayisama, F., Ahamad Shah, M. I., and Wan Adnan, W. N. A. (2019). Rhetorical style across cultures: an analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic writing of Thai and Malaysian students. LSP International Journal, 6(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v6n1.76

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16–29.

Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of Meta-discourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students’ timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001

Irham & Wahyudi. (2012). Treating disclaimer as a power strategy of self-legitimation and other-de-legitimation in Netanyahu’s UNGA speech. Language, Discourse & Society, 1 (2). pp. 89-106. ISSN 2239-4192

Jalilifar, A., Hayati, S., & Don, A. (2018). Investigating metadiscourse markers in book reviews and blurbs: A study of interested and disinterested genres. Studies about Languages, 2824(33), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.33.0.19415

Juditha, C. (2018). Hegemoni Media Sosial: Akun Gosip Instagram @ LAMBE _ TURAH SOCIAL Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 22(1), 16–30.

Kuswoyo, H., & Siregar, R. A. (2019). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in oral business presentation. Lingua Cultura, 13(4),

Lintang, N. S., & Jamil, A. (2021). The Students’ Reception of @Lambe Turah’s Gossip Account Posts in Public Relation Students at Mercu Buana University. EAI.

Lotfi, S. A. T., Sarkeshikian, S. A. H., & Saleh, E. (2019). A cross-cultural study of the use of metadiscourse markers in argumentative essays by Iranian and Chinese EFL students. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1601540

Mohamed, A. F. B., & Rashid, R. B. A. (2017). The metadiscourse markers in good undergraduate writers’ essays corpus. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 213. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n6p213

Niekerk, V. J. (2008). “The Virtue of Gossip”. South Africa Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 400-412. Nivales, M. L. M. (2005). “Hedging in College Research Papers: Implications for Language Instruction”. Asian EFL Journal 52: 35-45.

Ojo, O. E. (2020). Hedges and Boosters as Modality Markers: An Analysis of Nigerian and American Editorials. K@Ta, 22(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.22.2.55-62

Salager-Meyer, Françoise. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–171.

Siddique, A. R., Mahmood, M. A., & Iqbal, J. (2018) Metadiscourse analysis of PakistaniEnglish newspaper editorials: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n1p146

Sudaryanto, S., Soeparno, S., & Lilis Ferawati. (2019). Politics of language in Indonesia (1975-2015): study of history and language policy. AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.21009 /AKSIS.030113

Tijani-Adenle, G. (2020). International Federation of Journalists. In D. L. Merskin (Ed.), The SAGE international encyclopedia of mass media and society. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483375519.n322

Wijaya, A. E., Sonyaruri, A., Indriyani, D. M., and Utomo, A. P. Y. (2022). Analisis Penggunaan Frasa Nomina Pada Cerita Pendek Berjudul Robohnya Surau Kami Karya a. a. Navis. Jurnal Skripta, 8(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.31316/skripta.v8i1.2685

Zarza, S. (2018). Hedging and boosting the rhetorical structure of English newspaper editorials. UKH Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 41–51.https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjss.v2n1y2018.pp 41-51.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 41 times
 PDF Downloaded : 11 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Prihantoro Prihantoro, Muhammad Hifni Sahila Rizqy, Lira Yusnidar, Mariah Anggraeni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.