The Practice of Adu Rasa, Angon Rasa, and Njaga Rasa in the Speech Act of Javanese Kiai: An Ethnopragmatic Study

Setiawan Edi Wibowo(1),
(1) UNIVERSITAS SINGAPERBANGSA KARAWANG  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2020 Humanus

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v19i1.105880

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The current research is an ethnopragmatic study which aims to describe the practice of adu rasa, angonrasa, and njaga rasa in the speech act of the Javanese kiai. This research is an ethnographic field study. The data are the speeches of kiai from Central Java (Rembang and Demak) and East Java (Tuban) in the religious preaching activities, and they are provided through explanatory text. They are collected by observation and documentation through recording, observing and note-taking. The ability to understand, to see, and to remain considerate towards the interlocutor is necessary to make sure the communication runs very well. The practice of adu rasa, angon rasa and njaga rasa in the speech act of Javanese kiai is manifested in; (1) the speech act for convincing others under the principle of adu rasa and angon rasa (reassurance and sensibility management); (2) the speech act for convincing others under the principle of showing concern; and (3) the speech act for inviting others to do something (recommendation) under the principle of adu rasa and angon rasa.

Keywords: Speech Acts, Ethnopragmatics, Adu Rasa, Angon Rasa, Javanese Kiai


Keywords


Speech Acts, Ethnopragmatics, Adu Rasa, Angon Rasa, Javanese Kiai

References


Al-duleimi, A. D. D., & Hammoodi, W. R. (2015). A Pragmatic Study of Strategic Maneuvering in Selected Political Interviews, February, 79–99.

Gunarwan, Asim. (2000). “Tindak Tutur Melarang di Kalangan Dua Kelompok Etnis Indonesia: Ke Arah Kajian Etnopragmatik” PELLBA 13. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Unika Atmajaya. Pg. 1-38.

Netra, I Made. (2011). “Wacana Ritual Melong Pare Bulu Komunitas Petani Adat Bayan, Lombok Utara: Kajian Etnopragmatik”. Thesis. Master and Doctoral Program, Udayana University.

Rahardi, R. K. (2017). Linguistic Impoliteness in The Sociopragmatic Perspective, 29 (3), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.24954

Shu, X. (2018). Promoting Pragmatic Competence in Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 5, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104398

Subiyatningsih, F. (2018). Principles of Textual Rhetoric in CakCuk Discourse, 30(3), 279–290.

Suryanovika, C., & Negara, I. M. (2018). Speech Acts of the BR’ characters. HUMANIKA, 25(2), 75–87.

Tiani, R. (2016). Kajian Perilaku Pragmatis terhadap Tindak Tutur Santri Terhadap Kyai di Pondok Pesantren di Wilayah Kota Semarang. HUMANIKA, 23(2).

Wibowo, S. E. (2018). Etnopragmatik: Bingkai Budaya Jawa pada Tuturan Kiai Jawa. Grobogan: CV. Sarnu Untung.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 414 times
 PDF Downloaded : 466 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Humanus

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.