CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: DEALING WITH STUDENT’S MISBEHAVIOUR IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO YOUNG LEARNERS (TEYL)

Yeski Putri Utami

Abstract


Young learners are terms for children age 4-6 years old. Teaching English to Young Learners (TEYL) mean to prepare them to join primary or secondary school. The purpose of TEYL improving students’ soft skills such as good manners, common sense, empathy, and the ability to be cooperative with the teacher and friends in target language. In this point, a good teacher should provide creative and consistent classroom activities in order to produce smart, independent and discipline students. There are few things that we need to consider in Teaching English to Young Learners (TEYL); (1) is earlier really better? (2) Characteristic of young learners, (3) How children learn, and (4) Language learning environment. The biggest problem that teachers usually face are the characteristics of young learners such as loud, hyper, can’t sit still, too talkative, easily distractive, fun, social, curious, energetic and spontaneous. Smart young learners are easily bored if there is no challenge in the materials or the activities in the class are not fun enough for them. One of the best solutions to solve the problem as well as create smart, independent and discipline students that have been used in TEYL is managing classroom rules. The rules are (1) listen to the teacher, (2) sit down in your chair, (3) Speak English, and (4) be nice. Using classroom rules have been very useful in improving soft skills in TEYL.


Keywords


Soft Skills, Classroom Management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bruner, J. Child’s talk: learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1993

Faircloth, G. A qualitative study/counter-story telling: A counter-narrative of literacy education for African-American males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Miami University. 2009

Krashen, S. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 1981

Krashen, S. The Goodman-Smith hypothesis, the input hypothesis, the comprehension hypothesis and the (even stronger) case for free voluntary reading. In P. Anders (Ed.), Defying convention, inventing the future in literacy research and practice: Essays in tribute to Ken and Yetta Goodman. New York: Routledge. pp. 56-99, 2011

Piaget, J. The science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Oxford. 1970

Roof, L. M., & Kreutter, C. A. An interactive storytelling puzzle: Building a positive environment in asecond language classroom. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 12(1), 1-10. 2010

Şallı-Çopur, D. Teacher effectiveness in initial years of service: A case study on the graduates of METU foreign language education program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University,

Ankara, Turkey. 2008a

Scott, Wendy A. and Ytreberg, Lisbeth H. Teaching English to Children. Longman. 1993

Vygotsky, L. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1962


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.