PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CPS TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIS KELAS XII SMA

Muhandisa Muskhir - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


This study aims to obtain the influence of the application of the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) method in the learning process at SMA Negeri 3 Padang. This method is measured based on four indicators, namely (1) understanding of the problem, (2) selecting a strategy, (3) solving the problem, and (4) re-examining the results of the answers. The four indicators are used to measure students' ability to solve non-routine questions. The CPS method is applied by making students the center of learning. The treatment given to the experimental class is to provide a way to understand the problem. Understanding of the questions asked by the problem and followed by choosing the right strategy and how to solve the problem. The final treatment is to provide skills to interpret the meaning contained in the answers given and compare them with the questions to be achieved. The research was conducted using a quasi-experimental methodology with The Static Group Comparison Design. The conclusion that can be drawn is that there is a significant effect of applying the CPS method, namely the average ability of students in the experimental class is 9.04 in the experimental class and 8.06 in the control class based on the maximum assessment reference is 12. The CPS method in this study shows more influence the learning process.

 Keywords– Creative, Problem, Solving, mathematic, prevalent.


Full Text:

PDF (143-149)

References


D. Hernández-Torrano and L. Ibrayeva, Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019), Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 35, p. 100625, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625.

M. van Hooijdonk, T. Mainhard, E. H. Kroesbergen, and J. van Tartwijk, Creative Problem Solving in Primary Education: Exploring the Role of Fact Finding, Problem Finding, and Solution Finding across Tasks, Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 37, p. 100665, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100665.

E. Swanzy-Impraim, J. E. Morris, G. W. Lummis, and A. Jones, Creativity and initial teacher education: Reflections of secondary visual arts teachers in Ghana, Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 100385, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100385.

K. Potęga vel Żabik, Ł. Tanaś, I. Iłowiecka-Tańska, and M. Karwowski, Children’s implicit theories of creativity in science, Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 41, p. 100898, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100898.

A. W. Lazonder et al., Development and validation of RATje: A Remote Associates Test for Dutch children, Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 44, p. 101042, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101042.

E. Van Steenis, Leveraging dilemmas as a pedagogical tool for novice youth worker learning, Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 30, p. 100522, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100522.

J. Taar and P. Palojoki, Applying interthinking for learning 21st-century skills in home economics education, Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 33, p. 100615, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100615.

A. M. Corbacho et al., Interdisciplinary higher education with a focus on academic motivation and teamwork diversity, Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 2, p. 100062, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062.

B. K. Suryapuspitarini, W. Wardono, and K. Kartono, Analisis Soal-Soal Matematika Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) pada Kurikulum 2013 untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Peserta didik, PRISMA Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat., vol. 1, pp. 876–884, Feb. 2018.

I. D. Manurung, S. H. Hasibuan, and Y. Yusriati, Pelatihan Penyusunan Soal HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) bagi Guru-Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, J. PRODIKMAS Has. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.30596/jp.v6i1.7674.

I. A. A. Marpaung, M. Harefa, and R. N. Lubis, Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta didik Di Kelas Xi Sma Cerdas Murni Tembung Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri, Pros. Semin. Nas. Inov. Pendidik., no. 0, Art. no. 0, May 2022, Accessed: Jan. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://e-proceedings.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/PSNIP/article/view/741

P. Rana, F. D. Atem, C. Lebron, M. Sunil Mathew, R. A. Natale, and S. E. Messiah, Relationship between teacher fidelity to an early childhood obesity prevention program and the Child care center nutrition and physical activity environment, Prev. Med. Rep., vol. 30, p. 102024, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102024.

C. Rapanta, Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum?, Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 105, p. 103404, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404.

L. Disney and L. Li, Above, below, or equal? Exploring teachers’ pedagogical positioning in a playworld context to teach mathematical concepts to preschool children, Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 114, p. 103706, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103706.

D. H. Tong, B. P. Uyen, and N. Van Anh Quoc, The improvement of 10th students’ mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics, Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, p. e08282, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282.

S. Lehesvuori, M. Hähkiöniemi, L. Ketonen, M.-K. Lerkkanen, S. Pöysä, and E. Pakarinen, Reflections on dialogicity: Challenges and suggestions by mathematics student teachers, Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 31, p. 100567, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100567.

Ç. Haser, O. Doğan, and G. Kurt Erhan, Tracing students’ mathematics learning loss during school closures in teachers’ self-reported practices, Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 88, p. 102536, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102536.

J. DiNapoli and E. K. Miller, Recognizing, supporting, and improving student perseverance in mathematical problem-solving: The role of conceptual thinking scaffolds, J. Math. Behav., vol. 66, p. 100965, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100965.

T. Igarashi and D. Suryadarma, Foundational mathematics and reading skills of Filipino students over a generation, Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 96, p. 102688, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102688.

A. Mufidah, A. EKAYANTI, and J. Jumadi, Analisis Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Tahapan John Dewey Ditinjau Dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Peserta didik, Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, 2022. doi: 10/Skripsi%20Full%20Text.pdf.

Y. E. Panggabean, M. Mulyono, and H. Banjarnahor, Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Disposisi Matematis Peserta didik Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning, J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1855.

D. Ananda, F. N. Afifah, and N. Sopia, Analisis Kemampuan Disposisi Matematis Peserta didik MAN 1 Sintang Melalui Pendekatan Metaphorical Thinking, J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat. Jkt., vol. 4, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.21009/jrpmj.v4i2.25086.

I. S. Ndraha, R. N. Mendrofa, and R. Lase, Analisis Hubungan Minat Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika, Educ. J. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.56248/educativo.v1i2.92.

A. D. Sari and S. H. Noer, Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dengan Model Creative Problem Solving (Cps) Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika, Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat. Dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 2017.

N. Solihin, P. Yuanita, and M. Maimunah, Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial, J. Cendekia J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.924.

M. A. S. Cahyanto, S. B. Utomo, and S. Yamtinah, Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Problem Solving (Cps) Dilengkapi Handout Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Prestasi Belajar Peserta didik Materi Termokimia Kelas Xi Ipa Semester Ganjil Sma N 3 Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016, J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 5, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Dec. 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/pmat.v12i1.14361