Systematic Review: The Effect of Using Virtual Laboratory On Physics Learning to Improve Student’s Concept Understanding

Annisa Rahmi - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Hidayati Hidayati - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Hufri H - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Wahyuni Dewi - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia

Abstract


The 2013 curriculum requires teachers to be skilled in the learning process which makes students more active in learning activities. Physics learning does not only discuss theory, but also needs to do practical work so that students understand the concepts being taught, if schools have limitations regarding laboratory equipment, then they can use virtual laboratories instead. There are many research articles about the use of virtual laboratories in physics learning. However, there has been no systematic study that summarizes these studies, for this reason a systematic study is needed that will produce new information. This study aims to: (1) analyze the model/strategy/method of using virtual laboratories in learning physics, (2) analyze the effect of virtual laboratories in learning physics on increasing students' understanding of concepts. The method used in this study is a systematic review. The collected articles totaled 25 articles published in the last 10 years in national and international journals. Data analysis was performed using predetermined instruments and effect size formulas. The results of the study are learning models/learning strategies/learning methods for using virtual laboratories in physics learning to improve students' understanding of concepts, there are 7 learning models, and 2 learning approaches. The discovery learning learning model and inquiry learning model are the most widely used. momentum and impulse materials have a good effect on students' understanding of concepts. with an average effect size value of 1.95 with a high influence category


Full Text:

PDF

References


Juniarti, M. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berorientasi Pendidikan Karakter dengan Model Treffinger Bagi Siswa SMA.Journal of Education Technology. 1(2): 71-76.

Peraturan mentri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 24 tahun 2007 tentang saran dan prasarana untuk Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI), Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTs), dan Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA).

Sugiana, I. N., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Gunawan, G. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran generatif berbantuan media laboratorium virtual terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika siswa pada materi momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(2), 61-65.

Sumargo, E. (2014). Penerapan Media Laboratorium Virtual (PhET) Pada MAteri Laju Reaksi dengan Model Pengajaran Langsung.Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 3(1), 119-133.

Sunni, M. A, Wartono, W., & Diantono, M. (2014).Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Solving Berbantuan PhET Terhadap pPenguasaan Konsep Fisika dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA.In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-JOURNAL), 3, 103-107.

Hidayati, H., & Masril, M. (2019). Penggunaan LKM untuk menunjang kegiatan laboratorium virtual Fisika Inti. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 149-153.

Purnomo, H. 2011. Laboratorium Virtuil Sebagai Alternatif Kegiatan Laboratorium Kovensional Di Perguruan Tinggi. Orbith Vol. 7 No. 3 November 2011: 418-421.

Sutrisno.(2011). Pengantar pembelajaran inovatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.

Sony, S., & Katkar, M, D. (2014).Survey paper on virtual lab for E-Learners. International Journal of Application in Engineering & Management, 3(1), 108-110.

Perry, A., & Hammond, N. (2002). Systematic reviews: The experiences of a PhD student. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 2(1), 32-35.

Sugiyono, 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Becker, K., and K. Park. 2011. “Effect of integrative Approaches Among Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students’ Learning: A Preliminary Meta-Analysis.” Journal of STEM Education 12(5&6): 23-37.

Muryani, A. D., & Rochmawati. (2015). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Yang Berbantuan dan Tanpa Berbantuan Lembar Kerja Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi, 3 (2)

Masril, M., Hidayati, H., & Darvina, Y. (2019). Penerapan discovery learning berbantuan virtual laboratory untuk meningkatkan kompetensi fisika siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1).

Putrayasa, I. M., Syahruddin, H., dan Margunayasa, I. G. 2014. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Discovery dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Volume 2 Nomor 1.

Hafsyah, N. 2012. Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terstruktur dengan Media Virtual Lab pada Pembelajaran Fisika di SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika FKIP UNEJ, Vol I Nomor 2 : 158-16

Sugiana, I. N., Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Gunawan, G. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran generatif berbantuan media laboratorium virtual terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika siswa pada materi momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 2(2), 61-65.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/14780171074