Analysis Quality of Equation Items in Learning Evaluation for Physics Subject in High Schools of Mentawai Island Regency

Fredy Pratama - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Yenni Darvina - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia

Abstract


The process of evaluating learning outcomes is one thing that cannot be separated by a teacher to reveal the extent to which students receive and learning understanding given in class. To be able to produce good measurable values, the instrument used must also be good. A good instrument must have standards that have been tested as a whole, in this case the question sheets used as instruments in the evaluation process must be measurable and tested in consist of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and diffrentitation. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach by taking several samples of schools in the Mentawai Islands District. The analysis was conducted on the evaluation instrument or sheet used by teachers in schools in the form of 4 aspects analysis, namely validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and diffrentitation. The research purpose was to be able to find out to what extent the quality level of the instrument or evaluation sheet used by teachers in the sampled schools. The research results obtained showed that of the 4 samples of schools that were taken and examined, it shows that in terms of validity for the whole school it can be declared valid with a range of high to low categories. Meanwhile, for the reliability aspect, it was noted that 3 out of 4 schools had reliable instruments, while 1 school was classified as unreliable. For aspects by level of difficulty and item differentitation, it is still classified as very low because there are still less than 50% of the questions that are of good quality and have sufficient differentitation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Zainal, Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2016

Septiana, Nurul. Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester (UAS) Biologi Tahun 2015/2016 Kelas X dan XI Pada MAN Sampit. Edu Sains 4, no. 2 : h. 115. 2016

Widoyoko, Eko Putro. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar. 2014

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. 2016

Syamsudduha, St. Penilaian Kelas. Makassar: Alauddin University Press. 2016

Sudjana, N. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. 2014

Anita, A., Tyowati, S., & Zuldafrial, Zainal. Analisis kualitas butir soal fisika kelas x sekolah menengah atas. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 35-47.Wika Sevi Oktanin. Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Vol. XIii, No.1, Tahun 2018. 2018

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. 2016

Sudjono, Anas. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Rajawali. 1995

Arikunto, S. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. 2014

Purwanto, Ngalim. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Harsi, Deradi. Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Pemrograman WEB di SMK Kelas X Teknik Komputer Jaringan Kota Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016 Skripsi (Yogyakarta : Fak. Tekhnik, 2016), h. 20. 2003

Amirono, Daryanto. Evaluasi dan Penilaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media. 2016

Purwanto. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. 2011

D. Susanti, V. Fitriani, and L. Y. Sari, “Validity of module based on project based learning in media biology subject,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1521, no. 4, pp. 0–6, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042012.

Umacina, N. E. P., Mandolang, A. H., & Rondonuwu, I. T. Analisis butir soal sumatif semester ganjil mata pelajaran fisika. Charm Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 33-38. 2020.

Anita, A., Tyowati, S., & Zuldafrial, Z. Analisis kualitas butir soal fisika kelas x sekolah menengah atas. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 35-47. 2018.

Maulidah, H., Sukarno, S., & Syefrinando, B. ANALISIS KUALITAS INSTRUMEN TES FISIKA KELAS X MENGGUNAKAN SOFTWARE ANATES. Physics and Science Education Journal (PSEJ), 153-162. 2022.

Asrul, dkk. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Medan: Perdana Mulya Sarana. 2014.

Novia, T., Wardani, A., Canda, C., Nurdi, N., & Nurmasyitah, N. Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal UTS Fisika Kelas X SMA Swasta Muhammadiyah 4 Langsa. GRAVITASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains, 3(01), 19-22. 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/14539171074