Design of Physical Teaching Materials Based on Cognitive Conflict Learning in Direct Current Electricity Integrating Virtual Laboratory

Irfan Luthfi - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Fatni Mufit - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Mutia Putri - Department of Education, Monash University, Wellington Road, Melbourne, 3168, Australia

Abstract


Learning Physics in the 2013 Curriculum requires students to understand concepts. However, the facts found in the field show that students' understanding of concepts is still low and there are misconceptions, especially on unidirectional electricity. One solution to overcome this problem is to make physics teaching materials based on cognitive conflicts integrating virtual laboratories on unidirectional electrical materials to improve students' conceptual understanding. The aim pf this study was to produce a valid cognitive conflict teaching material design. This type of research was Design / Development Research. Using the Plomp model development which has two stages, namely Preliminary Research, at this stage an initial problem analysis was carried out by conducting concept tests on students using coding techniques and conducting interviews with teachers. The second stage of the Prototype Phase was the development stage by designing the required teaching materials. For the design of teaching materials that have been made, a self-evaluation test was carried out using the Likert formula, after which the expert validation or expert review was carried out using the V Aiken's formula for each indicator. Based on the analysis of the data obtained, it can be explained, at the Preliminary Research stage, it was found that in the same direction electricity material more than 30% of students experienced misconceptions and 50% of students did not understand. Meanwhile, teachers still use conventional learning (lecture method) and insufficient laboratory tools to do practicum. The second stage of the Prototype Phase produces teaching material design based on cognitive conflict. The results of the self-evaluation test showed that teaching materials at the validation level were very valid with an average value of 86.7 and the expert validation test for materials at the validation level was very valid with an average value of 0.87. The conclusion from the acquisition of the assessment of physics teaching material design based on cognitive conflict is declared valid and the characteristics of the teaching material are in accordance with the 2008 Ministry of National Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan Kreatif membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif:Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan. Diva Press.

Mufit, F., Asrizal, Hanum, S.A, & Fadhila, A. (2020). Preliminary Research in the Development of Physics Teaching Materials that Integrate New Literacy and Disaster Literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1481, No. 012041.

Mufit, F., Festiyed, F., Fauzan, A., & Lufri, L. (2018). Impact of Learning Model Based on Cognitive Conflict Toward Student’s Conceptual Understanding. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 335, No. 012072.

Mufit, F., Fauzan, A. (2019). Model Pembelajaran berbasis Konflik Kognitif (PbKK) Disertai Penerapan untuk Remediasi Miskonsepsi pada Sains dan Matematika. Malang: CV. IRDH.

Mufit, F., Asrizal., & Puspitasari, R. (2020). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Cognitive Conflict on Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 267-278.

Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Ferreira, M. J. M. (2012). Intelligent Classrooms and Smart Software: Teaching and Learning in Today’s University. Education and Information Technologies.

Aji, N.S., Widodo. (2017). Pengembangan LKS Gerak Harmonic Sederhana dengan Media Virtual Laboratory Berbasis Problem Based Instruction. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika. Vol 8, No 1.

Rosdiana, F. N. Jamalsari, & Y. B. Bhakti. (2020). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Laboratorium Virtual Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika. Vol 11, No. 2.

Rohma, Risalatun Nur. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Rangkaian Arus Searah di Kelas XII MAN 1 Jember. FKIP e-PROCEEDING, Vol. 2, No 1.

Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2012). Virtual Chemistry Laboratory: Effect of Constructivist Learning Environment. Turkish Online Journla of Distance Education.

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: A Introduction. In Educational Design Research.

Hermawan, A. H., Permasih, & Dewi, L. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Depdiknas Jakarta.

Riduwan. (2005). Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru, Karyawan, dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validdity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 45, 131-142.

Khairunnisa, H., Kamus, Z., Murtiani. (2018). Analisis Efektivitas Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika dengan Konten Kecerdasan Social pada Materi Gerak Parabola, Gerak Melingkar dan Hukum Newton untuk Kelas X SMA. Pillar of Physics Education, Vol 11. No 2, 121-128.

Hanum, S. A., Mufit, F., & Asrizal, A. (2019). Pengembangan LKS Berbasis Konflik Kognitif Terintegrasi Literasi Baru pada Materi Fluida untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMA. Pillar of Physics Education.

Fadhilah, A, F Mufit, Asrizal.(2020). Analisis Validitas dan Praktikalitas Lembar Kerja Siwa Berbasis Konflik Kognitif pada Materi Gerak Lurus dan Gerak Parabola. Pillar of Physics Education, Vol 13. No 1, 2020, 57-64.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/10771171074