Analyzed Quality Question Type Multiple Choices Questions (MCQ) of Final Exam Even Semester on Biology Course Class XI SMA Negeri Se-Kecamatan IV Jurai Academic Year 2017/2018

Nadya Syafti - Universitas Negeri Padang
Rahmawati Darussyamsu - UNP
Ganda Selaras - UNP
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal - UNP

Abstract


Researcher conducted a study with the aim to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis: 1) reliability, 2) the validity of the content and empirical, 3) distinguishing features, 4) level of difficulty, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects: 1)reliability packet A and B, belong to the category high,2)the validity of the content packet A & B, not fulfilling all criteriaand then validity empirically package A, 57.5% are invalid matter and packet B,65% are invalid matte, 3) the level of difficulty package A, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category while package B, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category. 4) different power packet A, obtained with different power values, namely 35 questions (87,5%) including good categories and 5 questions (12,5) which do not belong to the good category while package B, 29 questions (72,5%) is included in category and 11 questions (27,5%) which do not belong to category, 5) function options packet A, for options that are not qualified is 37% and the quality is 63% and packet B,for options that are not qualified is 31% and the quality is 69%. It can be concluded that the end of the semester exam subjects biology grade XI of the school year 2017/2018 in the se-kecamatan IV Jurai not meet both criteria.


Keywords


Analysis, Questions

Full Text:

Fullpaper

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2015. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Basuki, Ismet dan Hariyanto. 2015. Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Daryanto. 20014. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2003.Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003,Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas.2010. Petunjuk Teknis Analisis Butir Soal di SMA.Jakarta: Direktorat Pembina SMA.

Friatma, Ayunda, Syamsurizal dan Helendra. 2017. “Analisis Kualitas Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas XIIPASMANegeri Wilayah Selatan Kabupaten Solok Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016”. Bioeducational Jurnal, I (2),1-17.

Kemendikbud. 2015. Panduan Penilaian Untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kunandar. 2015. Penilaian Autentik (penilaian hasil belajar Peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013). Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Lufri & Ardi. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian. Padang: UNP Press.

Rahmani, Mita. 2015. Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Buatan Guru Biologi Kelas XSMA Negeri 1 Tanah Pinoh.Skripsi. Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura.

Sudijono, Anas. 2007. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sukardi. 2012. Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sunarti dan Selly Rahmawati. 2014. Penilaian Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: ANDI.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/apb.v4i1.5475

DOI (Fullpaper): http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/apb.v4i1.5475.g2945