THE NATURE OF POWER IN YOUNG ADULTS DYSTOPIAN LITERATURE AS AN ALTERNATIVE DISCUSSION IN IGNITING LITERARY ANALYSIS FOREFL COLLEGE STUDENTS

Leni Marlina, Hengki Agus Rifai

Abstract


Power is an inescapable feature in human interaction. The nature of power exists in all social interactions, and it appears in all of humans’ social relations’ (Taylor 2011, p.15). Power can be identified as a significant thing which can differentiate Young Adults (YA) texts from children’s texts in the concept of children’s literature as emphasized by Trites (2002, p.3) that ‘Young Adult novels are about power.’ Power has been discussed by many scholars, but the discussion on power in YA texts in literature class for EFL college students is still limited.  Therefore, the discussion on the nature of power in YA texts can be an interesting literary analysis in igniting a brighter future of teaching literature for EFL college students. The aim of this paper is to discuss the nature of power in two YA dystopian texts:  Suzanne Collin’s The Hunger Game (2008) and Pete Hautman’s Rash (2006). This paper compares and contrasts the nature of power in respect to the protagonists’ growing understanding of their place in the dystopian world. Through the discussion, this paper identifies the operations of power; the relationship between knowledge and power; and the construction of youth agency in Young Adults dystopian lliterature.


Keywords


power, young adults literature, dystopian text

Full Text:

PDF

References


Applebaum, Noga 2009, ‘The world upside down: technology, power and the adult-child relationship’, Representation of technology in science fiction for young adult people, pp. 95-126, Routledge, Hoboken.

Collins, Suzanne 2008, The Hunger Games, Scholastic, New York.

Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. 2nd ed., Vintage, New York.

Gray, Mitchell 2003, ‘Urban Surveillance and Panopticism: will we recognize the facial recognition society?’ Surveillance & Society. Vol.1, No. 3, pp. 314-330, Retrieved from in July 2012.

Hautman, Pete 2006, Rash, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Koskela, Hille 2003, ‘Cam Era’ the contemporary urban Panopticon’, Surveillance & Society. Vol.1, No.3, pp.292-313, Retrieved from in July 2012.

McHould, Alec; Grace, Wendy 2002, ‘An Ontology of the Present’, A Foucault Primer: Discourse, Power and the Subject, pp. 60-66, Routledge, London and New York.

O’Leary, T; Falzon, C 2010, ‘The Entanglement of Power and Validity: Foucault and Critical Theory’, Foucault and Philosophy, in T O’Leary & C Falzon (eds.), pp.78-98, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, West Sussex-UK.

Rabinow, Paul; Rose, Nikolas 2003, ‘The essential Foucault: Introduction’, Foucault Today, in P. Rabinow & N. Rose (eds.), New Press, New York.

Stephens, John 1992, ‘Readers and subject positions in children’s fiction’, Language and ideology in children’s fiction, pp.47-83, Longman, New York.

Taylor, Diana 2011, Michel Foucault: Key Concept, Acumen, Durham-UK.

Trites, Roberta S. 2000, ‘Disturbing the universe: power and repression in adolescence literature, pp. 1-20, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, IA.

Turner, John C 2005, ‘Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory’, European journal of social psychology, pp.1-22.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI