THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ETHNICITY DIFFERENCES AND LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ WILLINGNESS TO COMMUNICATE IN CLASSROOM DISCUSSION

Husna Muhibbati; Krispa Elan Paramudita E; Yoki Irawan

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ETHNICITY DIFFERENCES AND LANGUAGE LEARNERS’ WILLINGNESS TO COMMUNICATE IN CLASSROOM DISCUSSION

Husna Muhibbati, Krispa Elan Paramudita E, Yoki Irawan

Abstract

Willingnesstocommunicate(WTC) is defined as the intention to communicate given a choice, continues to establish itself as a determining construct in bringing about success or failure in learning a foreign language (Dӧrnyei,2005,Peng&Woodrow,2010). One of the factors affected it was cultural diversities from varies ethnics. Hence, learners’ ethnicity in willingness to communicate is a necessity that has to be considered in language education in multilingual context. In this study, the researchers investigated whether there is any statistically significant relationship between learners’ ethnicity and willingness to communicate in classroom discussion of graduate students of Universitas Negeri Padang that focused on minority and majority group. To collect the data, the questionnaire of willingness to communicate was distributed to the participants that consist of 38 graduate students of English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang. The quantitative data gathered through these instruments were analyzed to determine the degree of correlation between these two variables. Besides, individual semi-structured interviews with some of the participants were used to obtain supportive data. The results of correlational analyses revealed that there was a strong relationship between learners’ Willingness to Communicate and their ethnicity differences. So it can be concluded that a significant relationship between learner ethnicity and willingness to communicate can be seen in classroom discussion that the majority ethnic dominate and have willingness to express their ideas rather than minority group that come from minority ethnic in classroom discussion.

Keywords

Willingnessto Communicate, Multilingual, Minority and Majority Group.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness to communicate scale: Development and validation (Abstract].CommunicationMonographs,43(1),60-96.doi:10.1080/03637757609375916

Cao,Y.,&Philp,J.(2006).Interactional contextandwillingness tocommunicate:Acomparison ofbehaviorinwhole class,groupanddyadicinteraction.System,34(4),480-493.doi:101016/j.system.2006.05.002

Clement, R.,Baker,S.C.,&MacIntyre,P.D. (2003).Willingnesstocommunicatein asecondlanguage:The effectsof context,norms,andvitality.JournalofLanguageandSocialPsychology, 22(2),190-209. doi:10.1177/0261927X03252758

Compton, L. K. L (2007). The impact of content and context on international teaching assistants’ willingness to communicate in the language classroom.TESL-EJ, 10(4). Retrieved from: http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej40/a2.pdf.

Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dornyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53, 3-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53222

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology for language learner: individual differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hornby, A. S. (2003). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford Ney York: Oxford University Press

Kang, S. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33: 227-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004

MacIntyre,P.D.,Clement,R.,Dornyei,Z.,&Noels,K.A.(1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (4), 545-562.

MacIntyre,P.D.,Baker,S.C.,Clement,R.,Conrod,S.(2001).Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3),369-388.

Mackay,A.,&Gass,M.S.(2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. NewJersey, the United States ofAmerica:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.

McCroskey, J. C.,& Richmond, V. P (1987). Willingness to communicate. InJ. C. McCroskey & J.A.Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication(pp.129 156). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.

Martí, F. et al. (Eds). 2005. Words and worlds: World languages review. Clevedon England, Buffalo N.Y: Multilingual Matters.

Peng J, E. & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language learning, 60, 834-76.

Richards, J. C & Schmidt, R. (2010). Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. Fourth Edition. Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited

Valadi, A. et al. 2015. The Relationship between Language Learner’s Willingness to Communicate and Their Oral Language Proviciency with Regard to Gender Differences. International JournalofAppliedLinguistics&EnglishLiterature, Vo. 4 No 5. 2015, 147-153.