LEARNING STYLES AND ENGLISH ACHIEVEMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK FACULTY STUDENTS AT LANGUAGE CENTER OF SUSKA ISLAMIC STATE UNIVERSITY RIAU

Erna Nawir

Abstract


Learning styles are believed to affect learning achievement. The researcher’s aim was to find out the most preferred learning style and English achievement of Agriculture and Livestock Faculty students at Language Center of SUSKA Islamic State University Riau. Based on the theory, perceptual is the commonly proposed learning style in language learning consists of visual, auditory, tactile, kinesthetic, group, and individual, are identified to propose an alternative solution to the problem of mismatching between students’ preferred style and English lecturers’ way of teaching. The research was a descriptive quantitative research involving 29 students of class IIA at Agriculture and Livestock Faculty in 2012/2013 Academic year as the subject. Questionnaire and test were used. The data were analyzed through Reid’s calculation of the score of each style and the score of the English achievement of the students. Data analysis was interpreted, and the research finding was gained. The finding of the research showed that there were 23 students or 79.3% (from 29) mostly preferred kinesthetic learning style as the highest percentage among the other five styles (auditoria, tactile, visual, group, and individual sequentially). It also showed that related to their English achievement, 3 high-scored students or 75% (from 4) possessed kinesthetic and auditoria, 15 medium-scored students or 75% (from 20) possessed tactile and kinesthetic and 5 low-scored students or 100% (from 5) possessed kinesthetic and group style. In conclusion, the students did not only prefer to kinesthetic learning style, but they also had one other contiguous style for each group. 


Keywords


Learning Style, Achievement, Language Center

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akram, M., Shahzad, F., Waqas, A.K., Muhammad, L., Imtiaz, A.W. 2013. An exploration of relationship between perceptual learning style and achievement goals. International Journal of Bussiness and Behavioral Science. 3.1: 27-35.

Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles (An Integrative Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. 2002. Strategies for Success: A Practical Guide to Learning English. San Francisco: Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th Ed.). San Francisco: Pearson Education.

Cassidy, Simon. 2004. Learning styles: an overview of theories, models, and measure Educational Psychology. 24.4:419-445

Cresswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Diaz, L. T. 2004. Teaching English Learners Strategies and Methods. California: Pearson Education Inc.

Dasari, Pushpavathie. 2006. “The Influence of Matching Teaching and Learning Styles on The Achievement in Science of Grade Six Learners”. A Thesis. University of South Africa.

Dunn, R. Robert, A. V. Holtschienider, D. Klavas, A. Miles, B. Quinn, P. 2000. Effects on tactual kinesthetic instructional resources on the social studies achievement and attitude test scores and short and long term memory of suburban fourth grade students. National Forum of Special Education Journal. 9E:13-23.

Gufron, M. N and Risnawita, R. 2012. Gaya Belajar: Tinjauan Teoritis. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Griggs, S.A. 2011. Counselling for learning style. Journal of Counseling and Development. Accessed from http://ascd.org/services/eric/ericlngs.html, on Feb 15, 2013.

Halim, Abdul. 2006. The differences of learning style preferences based on the gender in learning English at SMP Muhammadiyah 8 Batu. Malang: Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Muhammadiyah University.

Khamkhien, Attapol. 2012. Demistifying Thai EFL learners’ perceptual learning style preferences. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 18.1:61-74.

Lodico, M. G. Spaulding, and K. H. Voegtle. 2010. Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: John

Wiley & Sons, Inc. Malone, T. 1981. Towards a theory of instrically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4: 339-369.

Nel, Carisma. 2008. “Learning Styles and Good Language Learners”; in Griffiths, Carol. (Ed), Lesson from Good Language Learners (p. 49-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pritchard, Alan. 2009. Learning Theories and Learning Style in Classroom. New York: Routledge.

Reid, J. M. 1987. The learning style preference of ESL students. TESOL QUARTERLY. 21.1:87-109.

Reid, J. M. 1998. Understanding Learning Styles in the Second Language Classroom. Wyoming: Prentice Hall Regents.

Rossi, Laura. 1989. “Perceptual Learning Style Preferences and Their Relationship to Language Learning Strategies in Adult Students of English as A Second Language”. Dissertation. Drake University.

Sims, R. R and Sims, S. J. 1995. The Importance of Learning Style: Understanding the Implication for Learning, Course Design, and Education. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

Sriphai, S,. S, Demrongpanit, J, Sakulku. 2011. An investigation of learning styles influencing mathematics achievement of sevent-grade students. Educational Reports and Reviews. 6.15:835-842.

Tekiner, Aylin. 2005. “The Relationship Between Perceptual and Social Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences and Their Effects on English Proficiency of Turkish Young Adults Learning English as Foreign Language”. A Thesis. The Medical East Technical University.

Tuan, L. T. 2011. EFL learners’ learning style and their attributes. Mediterranian Journal of Social Sciences. 2.2:299-320.

Vaseghi, R., Afsaneh, E.R., Reza, G. 2012. Language learning style preferences: a theoritical and empirical study. Advances in Asian Social Science. 2.2:441-451.

Wooldridge, Blue. 1995. “Increasing the Effectiveness of University / College Instruction: Integrating the Results of Learning Styles Research into Course Design and Delivery”; in Sims, R. R and Sims, S. J. (Ed.). The Importance of Learning Style: Understanding the Implication for Learning, Course Design, and Education. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI