CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) FOR ACHIEVING POSITIVE OUTCOMES OF STUDENTS COLLEGE

Sri Yuliani; Khulaifiyah Khulaifiyah; Andi Idayani

CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) FOR ACHIEVING POSITIVE OUTCOMES OF STUDENTS COLLEGE

Sri Yuliani, Khulaifiyah Khulaifiyah, Andi Idayani

Abstract

This research was aimed to find out the positive outcome of students college of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) on skill subjects. The sample of this research u'as semester six students of Islamic University of Riau who were taking Microteaching and ESP subject. The total sample was 30 students by using random sampling technique. The design of the research was experiment research focused on Post equivalent research. The instruments were questionnaires, observation, and interview. The treatment was given for 8 meetings in form of the students' assignment in giving motivation (story, Al Quran verse, wise words) for about 5 to 7 minutes. Based on the result, the data showed that there was significant effect of CLIL on the students outcome. The effect of CLIL was the students were eager to hear other motivation activities for next meetings, moreover the students were familiar with these moral values which effected their life style and behavior. The conclusion was CLIL was a methodological approach particularly suitable for contexts where students leamt content through supplementary teaching materials to give positive outcome of students' college.

Keywords

CLIL, Positive Outcome, Skill Subiects

Full Text:

PDF

References

Berraux. P, Coonan, C. M, Frigols, Martin, M, J, & Mehisto, P. (2009). The CLIL teacher's competences grid.

Common Constitution and Language Learning (CCLL) Cornenius, Netrwork. Retrieved from htrp://cclleu.eu/cms02/fileadmin/daten/Dateien/Konferenzen/THE-CLIL TEACHER-latest version.p d1-

Birdsong. D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds,). Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 82-105), Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Brewster, Jean, Ellis, Gail, Girard, Denis: The Primary English Teacher Guide. (2004). Penguin: Hong Kong.

Clegg. J. (2007) Analyzing the language demands of lessons taught in a second language. Models and Practice in CLIL. Revista Espaiola de Lingiiistica Aplicada- I l3-128.

Coyle, D. (1999). Students in content and language integrated contexts: Planning for effective classrooms. In J, Masih (Ed.). Learning through a foreign language: Models, Methods, and Outcomes. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research (CILT).

Coyle, D. (2006). Content and Language lntegrated Learning, Motivating Learners, and Teachers. University of Birmingham.

Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL-a pedagogical approach. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl, & N. Hornberger. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd edition (pp.97-111). Springer

Coyle, D, Hurod. P, and Marsh. D. (2010) CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: CUP.

Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning. Teaching Assesment. Strasbourg.

Communication from the Commission to the Spring European Council. lmplementing the renerwed Lisbon. Strategy for Growth and Jobs. "A Year of Delivery". in COM (2006) 816.

Cummins, J (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. en Review of Educational Research. 49(pp, 222-251).

Cummins, J and Swain. M. (1996). Bilingualism in education: Aspects of theory research and practice, 6th ed. London. Longman.

European Commission (2006), Eurobarometer: Europeans and their languages

Grabe, W, and Stoller. F. ( 1997) Content-based Instruction: Research Foundation. In Snow, M, y, Brinton, D. The Content-based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content. White Plains. N. Y: Addison Wesley Longman (pp.5-21).

Graddol. David (2006). English Next. London: British Council.

Graaff. R. Koopman. G. J.. Anikina, J. y Westhoff, G. (2007). An Observation Tool for Effective L2 Pedagogy in Content and Language lntegrated Learning (CLIL). An International Journal of Bilingual

Education and Bilingualism, 10 (5), (pp. 603-624).

Grenfell. M.and Hard, C. (eds) (2002). Modern Languages across the curriculum. London, Routledge Falmer.

Hillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4 (2), 1-12. ISSN 2011-6721.

Hyltenstam. K., & Abrahamsson: N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA.ln C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.). The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.539-588). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Krashen. S. (1985). the input hypothesis: issues and implications. Londres: Longman.

Lemke, J. L. (1997). Aprender a hablar ciencia. Lenguage, aprendizale y valores. Barcelona: Paidos.

Major, R.C. (1998). "lnterlanguage phonetics and phonology. An introduction". Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20- 2, (pp. 131-137).

Numero, 8 de 2013. Educacag e Formagao The Efects of CLIL from the Perspectite of In-service Teachers in Salamanca (Castilla y Le6n, Spain) www.exedrajournal.com

Maljers. A.. Marsh. D.- Wolff, D., Genesee, F., Frigols-Martin, M.. Mehisto, P. (2010). Diverse Converging Goals: CLIL in Etrope. Peter Lang: Frankfurt.

Marsh. D. and Marshland- B. (1999). Distance in-service Education for Enhancing Second Contexts - Language Learning. DIESeLL. Jyviiskyl?i: University of Jlviiskyl ii.

Marsh. D. y Lange- G. (eds.) (2000), Using languages to learn and learning to use languages, Jyv?iskyl 2i:University of Jyviiskylii.

Marsh. D.. Marsland- B. y Stenberg, K. (2001), Integrating competencies for working life. Iyviiskylit" Universitl' of Jl viiskylii.

Marsh. D. (2002), Content and Language Integrated Leaming: The European Dimension-Actions. Trends and Foresight Potential. European Commission, Public Services Contract DG 3406/001- 001

Marsh, D. & Frigols, M. J.2007 "CLIL as a catalyst for change in languages education"- Babylonia,3lUT(pp. 33-37).

Mehisto. P.. Marsh. D. And Frigols- MJ. 2008, Uncovering CLIL, Oxford. Macmillan Education

Mohan. B. ( 1986). Language and Content. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Newby. D. (2008), European . Portfolio for student teachers of Languages, available at http://wurv.ecm l.atlepostl

Naves, T. and Mufroz. C. (1999). CLIL experiences in Spain. ln Marsh. D. and Lang6. G- (Eds.) Intplementing content and language integrated learning. Jyviiskylii: University of Jyv6skyl?i.

Newport. E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language leaming. Cognitive Science. 14(1), (pp.11-28).

Nikula, T. and Marsh, D. (1997). Language and Content Integrated Learning in the Primary and Secondary School Sector. Hetsinki: National Board of Education.

Pavesi, M, Bertocchi, D, Hofmanova. M..2001. Teaching through a foreign language: a guide for teachers and schools to using Foreign Language in Content Teaching,. [32p.] ln D. Lang6 (Ed.), Insegnare in una lengua straniera. Direzione Generale della Lombardia on behalf of TIE-CLIL.

Skehan, P. (1998) A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford University Press.

Swain. M. and Lapkin. S. (1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16(pp. 371-391).

Swain, M. (1996), Integrating Language and Content in Immersion Classrooms: Research Perspectives en The Canadiatt )lodern Language Review,52 (a) (pp. 529-548)