IMPLEMENTATION OF HYPONIM IN IMPROVING STUDENTS' SPEAKING SKILL
Abstract
ln mastering English, Speaking is one of four basic skill that given to the students. As an oral productive skill, speaking which happens face to face between speaker and hearer (Widdowson.2Oll). It is a kind an interactive process to build meaning which covers producing, receiving, and processing inlormation (Burns and Joyce, 1997). Lack vocabulary is the major factor that students got difficulties to speak English at Faculty of Islamic Educational and Teacher Training, State Institute for lslamic Studies Imam Bonjol Padang. This can be seen from the results ofstudents'skills in interacting with one another and in lectures.. Their limitations in communicating orally clearly visible on disconnections process interaction, pause (silence), and miscommunications. From the existing literature it is known that the source of the above weaknesses caused by lack ofvocabulary (Rivers, l991). In order to make students able to speak English, the teaching of speaking must cover some components that indicated by mastering pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension (Brown, 1994). Hyponym can help students have some vocabularies in developing and improving their speaking skills through techniques: clustering, listing, pointing, and treeing. They are confident to speak. They also use antonyms as well as a synonym and homonyms. The students are encouraged to describe something or someone in and out class after they have some vocabularies. The lecturer then give feedback and the expansion of the topic for activity.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brown, H Douglas. 7994. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogt. Pearson Education Company: New York
Burn, A & Joyce, H. (1997), Focus on Speaking, Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research Depdiknas, 2004, Standar Kompetensi Mala Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah, Jakarta.
Criffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh
Harmer, Jeremy, 2001. The Practice of Language Teaching, England, Longman
Hervina. 2014. Grammatical Errors in Speaking made by The Third Year of English Department Students STIKIP Abdi Pendidikan Payakumbuh
Marianne Celce- Murcia. 2001. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language- third edition. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Musthafa, B. 2001. Communicative Language Teaching in Indonesia Nation, and Newton. 2009. Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. New York: Roudledge
Penny, Ur. ACourse inLanguageTeaching: Practice and Theory (NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p.63
Schmitt, Norbert. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press: New York
Nobert Schmitt. Vocabulary in Language Teaching (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). p. 142
Nunan, D. 2004. Task-Based Language Teaching, UK: University Press Cambridge
Radjab, Desmawati. 2014. Developing EFL Learners' vocabulary through Strategic Vocabulary, Learning Rivers. 1991,
Schmitt, Norbert. 1997. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Sulistyowati. Lilis. 2010. The Effectiveness of Teaching Vocabulary Using Hyponym Game.
Taslim, Fadilla. 2014. Jurnal Al-Ta'lim. An experimental study of teaching vocabulary by using hyponymy games on the seventh grader F Mts Syech Ibrahim Payakumbuh. Padang
Thornbury. Scott. 2002. How To teach Vocabulary. Pearson Education Limited: England
Wahdini. Lili.2014. Integrating Multicultural values in Teaching Speaking
Woddorvson, H. G. 2011. Teaching Language as a Communication. Oxford: Oxford Universitv Press Shaping
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang
This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:
The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI