STUDENTS' INABILITY TO IDENTIFY SENTENCE TYPES AND SENTENTIAL COMPONENTS: What Should We Do with It?

Lely Refnita

Abstract


The students of English Department of FKIP Universitas Bung Hatta need to have sufficient grammatical and communicative competence in the English language. It is sure that the ideal expectation should be collectively supported with any resources and programs. Based on a small preliminary research conducted at the English Department in Grammar IV class, it was found that many students were not able to identify sentence types and sentential components when they were asked to do such grammatical tasks. There were many 'unexpected' answers given by ttre students when they were asked to identify sentence types and sentential components. The condition academically reflects the unsuccessful instructions at the English Department. This paper discusses the students' inability issues based on two principle questions, namely (i) why are the students unable lo identify sentence types and sentential components granmatically? and (ii) what should be academically done to improve their ability to identify sentence types and sentential components as an efective way to shape better model for grammar instruction? The data presented in this paper are those collected based on a small preliminary research at the English Department of FKIP Universitas Bung Hatta in 2014. The population was the third year students of the department which comprised 104 students. The sample was selected by using cluster random sampling technique and it consisted of 35 students. The analysis and discussion are based on theories on fundamental English grammar and basic principles of learning a foreign language grammar.


Keywords


phrases, grammar, sentence types, sentential components, instruction, EFL

Full Text:

PDF

References


Biggs, J.B. (1989). 'Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching'. Higher Education Research and Development No. 8, pp. 7-25.

Brown. H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogt. (Second Edition). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Bygate. Martin, Tonkyn- Alan, and Williams, Eddie (eds.). 1994. Grammar and the Language Teacher. New York: Prentice Hall.

Jufrizal. 2010. "Simple and Complex Tenses in English: What should We Do with Them?" (A paper presented at the Second International Conference on Teaching English as a Foreign Language on May 1-2, 2010). Purwokerto: Universitas Muhammadiyah Punvokerto.

Lyons, John. 1987. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, John. 1990. Semantics. (Volume 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Odlin, Terence (ed.). 1994. Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Refnita, Lely. 2013a. "A Model of Integrated Assessment for Structure 1 Subject at University Level" (A paper presented at annual seminar on English Language and Teaching: August 20-21,2013). Padang: English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts. the State University of Padang.

Refnita, Lely. 2013b. "The Use of Crammar Assessment for Writing lnstruction: A Model for Classroom Practices at a University Level" (A paper presented at International Seminar on Languages and Arts; October 5-6-2013). Padang: Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni Uni-versitas Negeri Padang.

Saeed. John L. 1997. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Song. Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax. Singapore: Pearson Education Asia Ltd.

Uso, Juan. Esther.. and Martinez-Flor, Alicia (eds.). 2006. Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills. Berlin: Moutors de Gruyter.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang



This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI