EMPLOYING LINE APPLICATION FOR ENGAGING 'GADGET-FREAK' HIGH INTERMEDIATE STI'DENTS AT LBPP LIA PEKANBARU

Dewi Sari Wahyuni

Abstract


The gap between digital immigrant teachers and di-qital native students is inevitable. Prohibition o1 using gadgets in the classroom resulted in decreasing students' enthusiasm and participation in classroom activities. Therefore, this research was carried out. It',rvas based on the difficulty that the researcher as a teacher faced in engaging student to reach the targeted outcomes. LINE application was choosen for this investigation since it is applic,gble for smartphones and tablet computers as well as personal computers. The said application is also considered as one of the most frequent social network messengers used by these teenagers students in communicating with each other and it enabled the teacher to fit into students' place. Observation of l7 students has revealed that incorporating LINE was increasing not only the engagement of the students toward learning, but also their language skills. This is because the real-life collaboration existed among the students and the teacher. It was amazing to see how these young digital natives thrived on technology mediated by their gadgets. Meanwhile, the digital immigrant teacher, hardly struggled with adapting it. Although the lack of technology skills of the teacher sometimes slowed down the process of engagement, the teacher still managed to be in line with the students. On the contrary, there was so much temptation in misusing the gadgets for distracting purposes, which also turned out to be another problem to come to grips with. Despite those predicaments, employing LINE indeed worked well for engaging 'gadget-freak' High Intermediate students at LBPP LIA Pekanbaru.

Keywords


Application, Gadget-Freak, High Intermediate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, S., Maton. K. & Kervin, L. 2008. The 'Digital Natives' Debate: A Critical Review of The Evidence. British Journal of EducatioNal Technology, 30(5)-775-7 86.

Creswell, Jhon W. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Nerv Jelsev: Pearson E,ducation Inc.

Garret- N. 1991. Technology in the service of langua-ee learning: Trends and issues. tr4odern Langtrage Journal 75 (l),74-101

Mills, G. E. 2000. Aclion Research: A Guide for The Teacher Researcher. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall

Prensky, M.2001a. Digital Natives. Digital Immigrants. On the Hori:on,9(5), I-6

Porvel, A. 2009. The cornerslone: Classroom tnanagement that makes me teaching rnore effective. effcient, and enjoyable.2nd ed. Satellite Beach. FL: Due Season Press.

Salehi Hadi and Zeinab Salehi.2012. 3rd Inter national Conference on e-Education. e-Business, e- Ir'Ianagement and e-Learning IPEDR vol.27. Singapore:IACSIT press

Schmuck, R. A. 1997. Practical Action Researchfor Change. Arlington Height. lL: IRl/Sky,Light Training and Publishing.

Tapscott. D. 1998. Grov,ing Up Digital. The Rise of the Net Generation.Nerv York: McGrar.v Hill.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_%28application%29. retrieved January I1.2015


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang



This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI