TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY STROOP TASK BERBAHASA INDONESIA

Putri Nurazizah Rukman; Miqdad Daly Ahmad; Udi Rosida Hijrianti

doi:10.24036/rapun.v16i1.130311

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY STROOP TASK BERBAHASA INDONESIA

Putri Nurazizah Rukman⁽¹⁾, Miqdad Daly Ahmad⁽²⁾, Udi Rosida Hijrianti⁽³⁾,
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Indonesia
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Nurazizah Rukman, Miqdad Daly Ahmad, Udi Rosida Hijrianti

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v16i1.130311

Full Text:

Language : id

Abstract

The stroop task is a method of measuring selective attention that demonstrates automatic and controlled cognitive processes. The stroop task as a digitalized measuring tool makes it easier for users to administer and score efficiently. However, this digital stroop task is not yet available in the Indonesian version. Meanwhile, the use of English has not been fully mastered by layers of Indonesian society, which causes the risk of less than optimal test results. This research is a non-experimental quantitative research which aims to test the psychometric properties using a test-retest approach at a time interval of 7 days on the Indonesian language Stroop task measuring instrument in early adult individuals with the criteria of being 18-25 years old and not color blind. The reliability test was analyzed using the ICC formula and strengthened with the Cronbach's alpha internal consistency test. The results of research conducted on 170 respondents using accidental sampling showed good ICC coefficient results (r = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64, 0.93) and a Cronbach alpha coefficient of (α = 0.93). Thus, the stroop task in Indonesian has satisfactory psychometric properties and is suitable for use in the Indonesian population.

Keywords

Selective attention, psychometri, stroop task, test-retest

References

Ahsyari, E. R. N. (2014). Kelelahan emosional dan strategi coping pada wanita single parent (Studi kasus single parent di Kabupaten Paser). Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 2(3), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v2i3.3659

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Aprilia, L., Sari, D. P., & Puspitasari, R. (2023). Pelaksanaan model pembelajaran berbasis pemrosesan informasi di SMA Negeri 04 Kepahiang. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 11904–11915. https://publisherqu.com/index.php/pediaqu/article/view/412

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian. Jurnal Theorems (the Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/th.v2i1.571

Azwar, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar psikometri. Pustaka Belajar.

Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan validitas (Edisi 4). Pustaka Belajar.

Brunetti, R., Indraccolo, A., Del Gatto, C., Farina, B., Imperatori, C., Fontana, E., Penso, J.,

Ardito, R. B., & Adenzato, M. (2021). Estroop: Implementation, standardization, and systematic comparison of a new voice-key version of the traditional stroop task. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663786

Eide, P., Kemp, A., Silberstein, R. B., Nathan, P. J., & Stough, C. (2002). Test-retest reliability of the emotional stroop task: Examining the paradox of measurement change. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136(5), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209605547

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (second edition). Pratiques Psychologiques. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2020.06.005

Khairunnisa, N., & Hartini, N. (2022). Tingkatkan fokus dengan latihan buttoning skills pada anak mild intellectual disability. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 13(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v13n3.p318-330

Kim, T. Y., Kim, S., Sohn, J. E., Lee, E. A., Yoo, B. G., Lee, S. C., Hong, T., & Kim, M. J. (2004). Development of the Korean Stroop Test and study of the validity and the reliability. Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society, 8(4), 233–240. https://www.e-agmr.org/journal/view.php?vol=8&issue=4&spage=233

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Liang, J., Tang, M. L., & Zhao, X. (2019). Testing high-dimensional normality based on classical skewness and Kurtosis with a possible small sample size. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 48(23), 5719–5732. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1520882

Mariani, A. M., Niccolò, U., Roma, C., Niccolò, U., Roma, C., Caglioti, S., Niccolò, U., Roma, C., Mariani, A. M., Marsico, E., & Caglioti, S. (2022). Comparing exergames and aerobic exercise. Evaluation of the effects on emotions and executive functions. Formazione & Insegnamento, 2(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7346/-feis-XX-01-22_09

Mcintosh, E. G. (2020). A study of cognitive interference using the stroop effect. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 4(3), 149–151. http://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/T2043149151.pdf

Muthén, L., & Muthen, B. (2002). How to use a monte carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(4), 599–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8

Penner, I. K., Kobel, M., Stcklin, M., Weber, P., Opwis, K., & Calabrese, P. (2012). The stroop task: Comparison between the original paradigm and computerized versions in children and adults. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(7), 1142–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.713513

Periáñez, J. A., Lubrini, G., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Ríos-Lago, M. (2021). Construct validity of the stroop color-word test: Influence of speed of visual search, verbal fluency, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and conflict monitoring. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 36(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa034

Razali, N. M., & Wah, B. Y. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(November), 21–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267205556

Resmiya, L., & Misbach, I. H. (2016). Pengembangan alat ukur kualitas hidup Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Lingkungan Dan Pembangunan, 17(01), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.21009/plpb.171.04

Retnawati, H. (2017). Reliabilitas instrumen penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin UNNES, 12(1), 129541. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132255129/pengabdian/8 Reliabilitas3 alhamdulillah.pdf

Rueda, M. R., Moyano, S., & Rico-Picó, J. (2023). Attention: the grounds of self-regulated cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1582

Santrock, J. W. (2016). Life span development perkembangan masa hidup (Edisi 13). Erlangga.

Savaş, D. D. E., Yerlıkaya, D., Yener, G. G., & Tanör, Ö. Ö. (2020). Validity, Reliability and Normative Data of The Stroop Test Çapa Version. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 31(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5080/u23549

Soetisna, H. R., & Tania, D. (2016). Pengukuran tingkat konsentrasi para peserta didik untuk meningkatkan efektivitas kegiatan pendidikan di institusi pendidikan kemiliteran ‘X.’ Jurnal Ergonomi Dan K3, 1(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.ergo.2016.1.1.2

Solso, R. L., Maclin, O. H., & Maclin, M. K. (2019). Psikologi kognitif. Erlangga.

Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096

Stoet, G. (2017). Psytoolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (Mix methods). Alfabeta.

Suswanti, I., Budiharsana, M. P., Turana, Y., & Handajani, Y. S. (2020). Studi kohor atma jaya active aging research: gangguan kognitif lanjut usia. Kesehatan F, Universitas M, et Al., 7(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jpkmi.v7i1.8789

Tecce, J. J., & Dimartino, M. (1965). Effects of heightened drive (shock) on performance in a tachistoscopic color-word interference task. Psychological Reports, 16, 93–94. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.1.93

Van Ede, F., & Nobre, A. C. (2023). Turning attention inside out: How working memory serves behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-041757

Wang, R. Y., Zhou, J. H., Huang, Y. C., & Yang, Y. R. (2018). Reliability of the Chinese version of the trail making test and stroop color and word test among older adults. International Journal of Gerontology, 12(4), 336–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2018.06.003

Wicaksono, A., Gibran, F. A., Irmansyah, D., & Aji, H. (2021). Ukuran penyebaran data (Kemiringan dan keruncingan). Jurnal Ukuran Penyebaran Data (Kemiringan & Keruncingan), 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xjwqd

Widana, W., & Muliani, P. L. (2020). Uji persyaratan analisis. In Klik Media.

Zhu, M. (2020). The effect of language experience on stroop effect by Chinese english learners. Atlantis Press, 490(Elic), 452–456. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201127.090

Zulkifli, Rahayu, S. T., & Akbar, S. A. (2019). Hubungan usia, masa kerja dan beban kerja dengan stres kerja pada karyawan service well company PT. Elnusa TBK wilayah Muara Badak. Kesmas Uwigama Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 5(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.24903/kujkm.v5i1.831