ADAPTASI EUDAIMONIC WORKPLACE WELL-BEING SCALE (EWWS) VERSI INDONESIA

Tuti Rahmi; Ali Mubarak

doi:10.24036/rapun.v13i2.117090

ADAPTASI EUDAIMONIC WORKPLACE WELL-BEING SCALE (EWWS) VERSI INDONESIA

Tuti Rahmi⁽¹⁾, Ali Mubarak⁽²⁾,
(1) Fakultas Psikologi dan Kesehatan Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Bandung

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 Tuti Rahmi, Ali Mubarak

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v13i2.117090

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan adaptasi alat ukur Eudaimonic Workplace Well-being Scale (EWWS) agar dapat digunakan dalam konteks Indonesia. Eudaimonic Workplace Well-being merupakan konstrak dengan dua dimensi yaitu Interpersonal Workplace Well-Being dan Intrapersonal Workplace Well-being. Pendekatan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif dengan metode survey. Terdapat 201 orang karyawan dari salah satu perusahaan perkebunan di Indonesia yang menjadi subjek penelitian. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan Lisrel 8.8. Confirmatory Factor Analysis digunakan untuk mengukur validitas konstrak. Validitas konvergen ditunjukkan dengan mengkorelasikan EWWS dengan Ultrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), sedangkan validitas diskriminan dilakukan dengan mengkorelasikan EWWS dengan Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Perhitungan reliabilitas menggunakan Constract Reliability (CR). Hasil analisis data dengan confirmatory factor analysis menunjukkan fit dengan data. UWES berhubungan positif dengan Interpersonal Workplace Well-being dan Intrapersonal Workplace Well-being. Sebaliknya korelasi yang negatif terlihat pada hubungan EWWS dengan PSS. Berdasarkan hal tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa EWWS valid dan reliabel untuk digunakan dalam konteks Indonesia.

Keywords

Employee Well-Being, Eudaimonic Well-Being, Adaptation, Indonesian

References

Bartels, A. L., Peterson, S. J., & Reina, C. S. (2019). Understanding well-being at work: Development and validation of the eudaimonic workplace well-being scale. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0215957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215957

Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Luypaert, G. (2014). The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being-the role of work-related social support. Career Development International, 19(7), 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2013-0114

Cohen, S. (1986). Contrasting the Hassles Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale. Who’s Really Measuring Appraised Stress? American Psychologist, 41(6), 716–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.6.716

Cotton, P., & Hart, P. M. (2003). Occupational wellbeing and performance: A review of organisational health research. Australian Psychologist, 38(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707117

Culbertson, S. S., Fullagar, C. J., & Mills, M. J. (2010). Feeling good and doing great: The relationship between psychological capital and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020720

der Kinderen, S., & Khapova, S. N. (2020). Positive Psychological Well-Being at Work: The Role of Eudaimonia. In The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being (pp. 1–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02470-3_79-1

Elovainio, M., Heponiemi, T., Kuusio, H., Jokela, M., Aalto, A.-M., Pekkarinen, L., Noro, A., Finne-Soveri, H., Kivimaki, M., & Sinervo, T. (2015). Job demands and job strain as risk factors for employee wellbeing in elderly care: an instrumental-variables analysis. The European Journal of Public Health, 25(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku115

Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0

Keeman, A., Näswall, K., Malinen, S., & Kuntz, J. (2017). Employee Wellbeing: Evaluating a Wellbeing Intervention in Two Settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00505

Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31(2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463

Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The ‘What’, ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of Employee Well-Being: A New Model. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9270-3

Rahmadani, V. G., Schaufeli, W. B., Ivanova, T. Y., & Osin, E. N. (2019). Basic psychological need satisfaction mediates the relationship between engaging leadership and work engagement: A cross-national study. Human Resource Development Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21366

Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4

Saraswati, K. D. H. (2017). Perilaku Kerja, Perceived Stress, dan Social Support pada Mahasiswa Internship. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 1(1), 216. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.352

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N. (2015). Workaholism vs. Work Engagement: the Two Different Predictors of Future Well-being and Performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9410-x

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kubota, K., & Kawakami, N. (2012). Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions? Industrial Health, 50(4), 316–321. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.MS1355

Straume, L. V., & Vittersø, J. (2012). Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.711348

Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678