ADAPTASI EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SCALE (EES) DAN BUKTI RELIABILITAS & VALIDITAS

Lusiana Effendi; Airin Triwahyuni

doi:10.24036/rapun.v14i2.116161

ADAPTASI EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SCALE (EES) DAN BUKTI RELIABILITAS & VALIDITAS

Lusiana Effendi⁽¹⁾, Airin Triwahyuni⁽²⁾,
(1) Padjadjaran University

Indonesia
(2) Padjadjaran University

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Lusiana Effendi, Airin Triwahyuni

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v14i2.116161

Full Text:

Language : id

Abstract

Salah satu kunci sukses perusahaan adalah keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai. Karyawan / pegawai yang memiliki keterlibatan yang kuat biasanya dapat bekerja lebih baik dan memberikan hasil kerja yang lebih baik pula bagi perusahaan. Salah satu cara mengukur keterlibatan ini adalah dengan alat ukur keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai. Alat ukur keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai ini dikembangkan oleh Shuck dkk. (2016) dan belum pernah diadaptasi dalam konteks budaya Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengadaptasi skala keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai sesuai rekomendasi ITC Guidelines (ITC, 2016) dengan bukti reliabilitas dan validitas yang baik. Uji yang dilakukan meliputi reliabilitas konsistensi internal Alpha Cronbach, validitas isi, teori tes klasik melalui daya pembeda item, serta analisis faktor konfirmatori. Partisipan dalam penelitian (N=337) diambil dengan mempertimbangkan kemudahan sampling. Skala yang diadaptasi menghasilkan reliabilitas konsistensi internal α=0.917. Hasil uji menunjukkan bahwa validitas isi relevan (I-CVI ; S-CVI/UA ; S-CVI/Ave ) dengan daya diskrimasi item yang baik ( ). Hasil analisa faktor konfirmatori menunjukkan skala keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai memenuhi kriteria kecocokan (CFI=0.956; TLI=0.942; NNFI=0.942; NFI=0.937; PNFI=0.710; IFI=0.956; RNI=0.956; RMSEA=0.080; SRMR=0.050; dan GFI=0.928) dengan satu modifikasi indeks pada item EE3 & EE4. Hal ini berarti alat ukur skala keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai yang telah melalui serangkaian proses adaptasi ke dalam versi Bahasa Indonesia adalah reliabel dan valid.

Keywords

adaptasi; keterlibatan karyawan / pegawai; reliabilitas; validitas

References

Azwar, S. (2015). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.

Azwar, S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Psikologi (3rd ed.). Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.

Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Barbour, J. P. (2014). Enhancing work-related attitudes and work engagement: A quasi-experimental study of the impact of an organizational intervention. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034508

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x

DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290502300303

Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C., Anderson, R. E., & Babin, B. J. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268

Kahn, W. A. (2013). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

Lynn M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. In Nursing Research (Vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 382–386). http://ijoh.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijoh/article/view/26

Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.

Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., & et al. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.430

Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169

Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What Do We Really Know About Employee Engagement? Ce Development Quarterly, 25(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21187

Salanova, M., González-romá, V., Bakker, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Sarti, D. (2014). Job Resources as Antecedents of Engagement at Work: Evidence From a Long-Term Care Setting. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21189

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Shuck, B., Adelson, J. L., & Jr, T. G. R. (2016). The Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence for Construct Validity and Implications for Theory and Practice. Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21811

Shuck, B., Osam, K., Zigarmi, D., & Nimon, K. (2017). Definitional and Conceptual Muddling : Identifying the Positionality of Employee Engagement and Defining the Construct. August. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317720622

Shuck, B., & Reio, T. G. (2014). Employee Engagement and Well-Being: A Moderation Model and Implications for Practice. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 21(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813494240

Tripathi, D. J. P., & Sharma, M. S. (2016). The Key to Improve Performance:Employee Engagement. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(10), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-1810041925