Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focusing on Indonesian language and literature education perspective, Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia provides a platform for the presentation, analysis, and criticism of provocative work, publishing articles that transcend disciplines and advance the study of Indonesian language and literature education, such as:

The research results of Language Learning and Indonesian Literature.
The research results of experimental research of Language Education and Indonesian Literature.
The research result of Class Action Research (CAR) of teaching of Language and Literature Indonesia.
Research result of Indonesian Linguistics and Literature.
Linguistic and Literary analysis.

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions
Indexed
Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Articles submitted to Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah (e-ISSN: 2302-3503) will be evaluated through 2 stages of review, ie pre-review and substance review.

The pre-review of the article is carried out by the editorial team to review the conformity of the article with the focus and scope of the journal as well as the journal style and specific writing guidelines. Plagiarism checking is carried out by using Google Scholar and Turnitin software. Duration of review between 1-2 weeks.

Substantial single-blind reviews are performed by at least 2 reviewers. Duration of review between 3-8 weeks. If desired, the reviewer may request a re-review after the author revises his/her article.

The decision of whether the article can be published is authorized by the Editor in Chief by considering recommendations from reviewers. Articles that have been accepted and have been in-layout will be published in the In Progress issue before the regular issue is published on schedule, so they can be indexable and citable immediately.

If you would like to become a reviewer for Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah, please contact us. You should provide some descriptive words of your reviewing interests. We will register you as a Reviewer and an Author into Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah within 3 working days. Your account information, i.e. username and password, will be delivered to your email.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statements

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (e-ISSN: 2302-3503) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (nama publisher). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia as the publisher of Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Author's reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Reviewer

Prof. Dr. Atmazaki, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Prof. Dr. Syahrul R., M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Prof. Dr. Yasnur Asri, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Prof. Dr. Harris Effendi Thahar, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Dr. Norliza Jamaludin /Universiti Putra Malaysia

Dr. Mazhni Mohd. Mochtar /Universiti Putra Malaysia

Dr. Erizal Gani, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Dr. Abdurahman, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Dr. Amril Amir, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Dr. Tressyalina, M. Pd. /Universitas Negeri Padang

Indexing

Scientific Statements

Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia is a journal of focusing on Indonesian language and literature education perspective published by the Indonesian Language Education Study Program of Language and Art Faculty, State University of Padang and this journal is scientific. Some evidence is seen from aspects of the published article which are derived from the results of research on such as: the research results of experimental research of language education and indonesian literature, and research result of indonesian linguistics literature and literary analysis. The journal covers all issues in Indonesian language Education studies. The coverage of the discussion in Indonesian language Education may be viewed from various perspectives of disciplines. The process of receiving articles is carried out with peer reviewers by experts in their fields and a plagiarism test is carried out through Turnitin applications and the like. Thus, articles published are protected from plagiarism. Jurnal pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia is intended to be published Forth a year in March, June, September, and December.