MASALAH SISWA UNDERACHIEVER DAN PERAN GURU BIMBINGAN DAN KONSELING DALAM PENGENTASANNYA

Setyo Lelono(1),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2018 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v5i1.9976

Full Text:    Language : ind

Abstract


The aim of the research is to disclose some aspects of underachiever students and the role of guidance teachers in handling the students problems. This study is classified into descriptive quantitative method. The underachiever student’s problems based upon each problemed field ranked from the most problems up to the least problems namely: (1) learning skill problems, (2) personal problems, 3) learning environment and socio-emotional problems, (4) lesson material mastery pre requirement problems and (5) medium of learning problems. Most of the underachiever student eventually have less learning motivation. The parents of underachiever student who are most of strata 1 graduates and civil servants. The role of guidance and counseling teacher is not yet optimal and not yet focus because they have no time for entering classes and the  ratio number of the guidance and counseling teacher is not equal with the number of the guided students.


Keywords


Masalah siswa; Siswa Underachiever; Peran Guru BK

References


Ahmadi, Abu dan Widodo, S. 2003. Psikologi Belajar, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 1994. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Dinkmeyer, D.C & Munro, J.J. 1971. Group Counseling : Theory and Practice.Illionis : F.E. Peacock Publishers,Inc.

Elfi. 2002. “Peranan Guru Pembimbing Terhadap Siswa Bermotivasi Belajar Rendah di SMU Negeri 8 Padang”. Tesis. Padang : Program Pascasajrana UNP Padang.

Fry, Ron. 1994. How to Study. Singapore : S.S. Mubaruk & Brothers Pte.Ltd.

Haditono,Siti Rahayu. 1979. “Achievement Motivation, Parent Education, and Child Rearing Practice in Four Occupational Group”. Disertasi. Yogyakarta : Fakultas Ilmu Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Munandar,Utami. 2002. Anak-Anak Berbakat, Pembinaan dan Pendidikannya. Jakarta : CV. Rajawali.

--------- 2004. Pengembangan Kreatifitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Nirwana, Herman, dkk. 2006. Bahan Ajar Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Padang : FIP Universitas Negeri Padang.

Prayitno, dkk. 1997. Seri Pemandu Pelaksanaan Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah (Buku III). Jakarta : PT Bina Sumber Daya MIPA.

----------. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Rumpak,Julius C. dkk. 2002.Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (edisi 3).Jakarta : Balai Pustaka

Sardiman A.M. 2011. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Surya, Moh. 1979. “Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Non Intelektual Terhadap Gejala Berprestasi Kurang”. Disertasi. Bandung : Pascasarjana IKIP Bandung.

Syah, Muhibbin. 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sylvia, Rimm. 2000. Why Bright Kids Get Poor Grades (alih bahasa oleh A. Mangunhardjana). Jakarta : PT Gramedia Widiasarana.

Yusuf, A.Muri. 2005. Dasar-dasar dan Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. UNP Press.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 879 times
 PDF Downloaded : 746 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.