Muhammad Al-Hafizh(1),
(1) FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2017 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa


Full Text:    Language : en


There were great shifts in English Language Teaching (ELT) approaches and methodologies in recent years. At the same time, many researches occurred about the applications of teaching English as Second Language (ESL). It shows that, changes and innovations are something good in order to find a better pedagogic system and to be more professional in ELT. Sometimes, people resist new ways of looking, at least at the first, and it happened on ELT as well. This article is aimed at revealing ELT new ways of looking-to consider the beneficial factors of using prose in enriching interactive English language teaching into participatory English language teaching, whenever teacher and students are able to share power and come together in dialogue and mutual respect. It is considerable to reach the two components of English language pedagogy; cognitive abilities, and proficiency in English language. The writer is inspired by the thought of Shirley Brice Heath once said that “literature has no rival in its power to create natural repetition, reflection on language and how it works, and attention to audience response on the part of learners”. Teachers can use prose as a pivot in literature-based curriculum, around which curriculum revolves. In this article there will be five praiseworthy elements of prose as a pivot of participatory ELT that are going to be discussed; (1) prose is authentic, (2) prose can provide memorable contexts for the language, (3) prose illustrates appropriate language for specific situations, (4) prose links students to other cultures and subcultures, (5) prose presents topics for critical analysis, discussion, writing, and encourages performance.


prose, participatory ELT, pivot, literature-based curriculum


Auerbach, E. 2000. the Politics of the ESL, Classroom: Issues of Power in Pedagogical choices. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Amato, Patricia A Richard. 2003. Making it Happen; from Interactive to Participatory Language Teaching. New York: Longman

Bertens, Hans. 2008. Literary Theory: The Basics. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Chatman, Seymour. 1980. Story nd Discourse, Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. London: Cornell University Press.

Gilbert, Rod. 1996. Postmodern Wetlands: Culture, History, Ecology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Heath, S.B. 1983. Ways with Wors: Language, Life and work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hausser, Arnold. 1985. The Sociology of Art. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hawkes, Terence. 1977. Structuralism and Semiotics. London: The Chaucer Press Ltd.

Iser, Wolgang. 1987. The Act of Reading : A Theory of Aesthetic Response. New York: The John Hopkins University Press.

Pennycook, A. 1999. Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. White Plains: Longman

Selden, Raman. 1985. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

Wellek, Rene & Austin warren. 1977. Theory of Literature. San Diego: Harcout Brace Javanovich Publisher.

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 1163 times
 PDF Downloaded : 360 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.