DUNIA ABSURD DAN PERLAWANAN KELAS PADA DRAMA DAG-DIG-DUG KARYA PUTU WIJAYA

I Nyoman Yasa(1),
(1) Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2017 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v3i2.7374

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Research on drama in Indonesia is an effort to apply and express the theory in Indonesia. Naturally a theory existence from research accumulation to applied skills. It is hoped that this research can accumulate the science, mainly drama. The term of absurd was used by Martin Esslin for kind of theater that used the failure of language as main of communication. Besides, this term is popularized by Eugene Ionesco. He is a writer of absurd theater. Many of his drama already translated and performed in Indonesia. The data that already collected is analyzed by using the concept of absurdity to reveal the absurdity in Dag-Dig-Dug drama. In other side, the concept of class from Karl Marx is used to comment the domination and class resistance that are taken from Dag-Dig-Dug drama. Dag-Dig-Dug shows the social problems, mainly domination and hegemony of powerful person toward proletarian people. The domination and hegemony are in form of physics and psychology.


Keywords


drama, absurd, dominasi, hegemoni

References


Abdulah, T. Imran, dkk. 1985. Drama Putu Wijaya: Aduh. Jakarta: Pusat Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Depdikbud.

Esslin, Martin. 1976. The Theatre of The Absurd (Revised and enlarged edition). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.

------- 1978. An Anatomy of Drama. London: Abacus.

------- 1987. The Field of Drama, How The Signs of Drama Create Meaning on Stage and Screen. London: Metheuen Publishing.

Hendarto, Heru. 1993. Mengenal Konsep Hegemoni Gramsci. Eds. Tim Redaksi Dryarkara. Diskursus Kemasyarakatan dan Kemanusiaan. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of aesthetic Response. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Luhulima, James. 2002. Hari-hari Terpanjang Menjelang Mundurnya Presiden Soeharto dan Beberapa Perstiwa Terkait. Jakarta: Kompas.

Oemarjati, Boen S. 1971. Bentuk Lakon dalam Sastra Indonesia. Djakarta: Gunung Agung.

Soemanto, Soebakdi. 2002. Godod di Amerika dan di Indonesia: Suatu Studi Banding. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Suseno, Franz Magis. 2001. Pemikiran Karl Marx dari Sosialisme Utopis ke Perselisihan Revisionisme. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Teeuw, A. 1983. Membaca dan Menilai Sastra. Jakarta: Pt. Gramedia.

Wijaya, Putu. 1986. Dag-Dig-Dug. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 743 times
 PDF Downloaded : 210 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.