Exploring Verbal Interaction of Non Language Subject Classroom

Ratmanida Ratmanida(1), Yetty Zainil(2), Havid Ardi(3),
(1) English Department of FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) English Department of FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(3) English Department of FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2020 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v14i1.108546

Full Text:    Language : en


Given the important role of verbal interaction in teaching and learning process and shaping students’ attitude have been the subject of interest of several researchers. The aim of the study was to explore the pattern of verbal Interaction of non language subject at one of the fledgling international standard schools (FISS) in Padang. The site of the  study is  SMA 1 Padang. Participants of the research were 2 Physics teachers along with their students. Data of this study were drawn from direct classroom observation, and intensive interview; and these data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The result of study reveals that the highest occurrences of teacher-students interactions patterns are Explanation (E), Asking Question (AQ), and the category of Accept and Used of idea of Pupils (AUIP). Meanwhile, students-teacher interaction consisted of three categories, namely Classical Response (CR), Individual Response (IR), and student initiation (SI). Classical response was found to be the highest occurrence. It indicated that the teacher was still dominated the classroom interaction that needs to be shifted to students-oriented.


classroom interaction; FIAC; pattern; verbal interaction, non-language, Physics


Adeyemo, S. (2010). Teaching/learning physics in Nigerian secondary school: The curriculum transformation, issues, problems and prospects. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 99–111.

Allwright, R. L. (1984). The Importance of Interaction in Clasroom Language Teaching. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156–171.

Amy, T. B. (1985). Analyzing input and interaction in a second language classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research in Southeast ASIA, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600102

Amy, T. B. (1995). Introducing Classroom Interaction. London: Penguin Group.

Amy, T. B. (1997). Awareness raising about classroom interaction. In Encyclopedia of language and education: Knowledge about Language. Kluwer Academic.

Amy, T. B. (2001). Classroom interaction. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to Speakers of other languages (pp. 120–125). New York: Cambridge Univercity Press.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.).

Camargo, C. A. C. M., Camargo, M. A. F., Carvalho, M. F. de, & Oliveira, C. V. C. (2018). Classroom: A Space of Pedagogical Interaction. OALib, 05(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104958

Chaudron, C. (2006). Second language classroom: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univercity Press.

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education.

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behaviour. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.

Gibbon, P., & Hammond, J. (2001). What is scaffolding? In J. Hammond. In Teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Newtown NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.

Hamzah, H., & Rozimela, Y. (2018). Penggunaan penyangga pembelajaran oleh guru sekolah menengah atas di Sumatera Barat. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 12(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v12i1.10195

Irona, A., & Ratmanida. (2018). Using information gap activity in classroom interaction to increase the students’ speaking ability. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(1), 216–223.

Kalu, I. (2008). Classroom interaction patterns and students’ learning outcomes in Physics. The Social Sciences, 3(1), 57–60.

Lim, S., Park, K. C., Ha, M., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2019). Verbal interaction types in science inquiry activities by group size. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106164

Mardiana, F., Zainuddin, Z., & Gultom, J. J. (2019). Verbal interaction in English classroom using Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories System (FIACS). GENRE Journal of Applied Linguistics of FBS Unimed, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24114/genre.v7i3.12443

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research designe: An interactive approach. Applied Social Research Method Series 4. (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication.

Prabhu, N. S. (1992). The dynamics of the language lesson. TESOL Quarterly, 26(21), 225–241.

Rabgay, T. (2014). Patterns of teacher-student verbal interaction in the tenth grade biology classes in Samtse district. RABSEL: The CERD Educational Journal, 15(June), 1–23.

Smith, E. C. (1976). A latitudinal study of pre-service instruction in Flanders’ Interaction Analysis Categories (Arizona State University). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED120122.pdf

Taous, B. (2013). The role of classroom interaction in improving the students’ speaking skill: Case study of the third year LMD students of English at Biskra University. Biskra University.

Thomas, A. M. (1996). Classroom interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Wragg, E. C. (2002). An introduction to classroom observation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357279

Wu, K. Y. (1993). Classroom interaction and teachers questions revisited. , 24 (2). RELC Journal, 24(2).

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 428 times
 PDF Downloaded : 158 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.