Hermawati Syarif(1), Rahmi Eka Putri(2),
(1) FBS Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2018 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa


Full Text:    Language : en


Through the analysis of lexical density, students’ progress in language learning, especially in writing can be identified. This article aimed to find out lexical density of students’ writing and to explain how  lexical density shows their ability in writing an academic text. The data were taken from the introduction section of thesis proposals written by English graduate students, with the readers of higher education level. By statistical and descriptive analysis, the study reveals that the lexical density of students’ writing is categorized as less dense (51.19%). Grammatical complexity became the major factor that contributed to lexical density. It was revealed that the complexities emerged since students still have limited knowledge about the language use in writing an academic text. The fact shows that students’ ability in writing  academic text is still in average level. This implies that the ones who write the text should consider the high density for the academic text. It is recommended to provide the topic of lexical density in the subject of academic writing subject in the syllabus of English study program of higher education.


lexical density, writing ability, academic text, language use


Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.

Cali, K. (2015). The style of academic writing. Retrieved from: on August 25th, 2016.

Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (2005). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and written language. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Johansson, V. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing. Lund University: Lund University Press.

Rahmansyah, H. (2012). Grammatical intricacy and lexical density of the SMA student’s textbooks. Thesis. Medan: Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Refnaldi. (2015). When verbs become nouns: grammatical metaphor in students’ academic texts. Paper presented on International Seminar on English Language and Teaching 3 (ISELT-3) in Universitas Negeri Padang. Padang, May26rd – 27th, 2015.

Rosenwasser, D. & Stephen, J. (2012). Writing analytically, 6th edition. Boston: Warsworth Language Learning.

Soles, D. (2010). The essentials of academic writing, 2nd ed. Boston: Wadsworth.

Stubbs. M. (2002). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Swales, J.M. & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential task and skills 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Syarif, H. (2011). The cohessiveness of students’ writing: An analysis of thesis discussion section of English graduate students. Paper presented on Eight Conference on English Studies (CONEST 8) in Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia. Jakarta Dec 1st – 2nd, 2011.

To, V., Fan, S., & Thomas, D. (2013). Lexical density and readability: A case study of English textbooks. Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society. ISSN: 1327-774X.

Wallwork, A. (2011). English for writing research papers. New York: Springer.

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 1390 times
 PDF Downloaded : 439 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.