STUDENTS’ VISUALIZATION IN READING AND THEIR COGNITIVE LEARNING STYLES

(1) Universitas Negeri Padang 

(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 

(3) Prof. Dr. Hamka II Padang 


Copyright (c) 2019 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v13i1.103965
Full Text:

Abstract
Keywords
References
Almasi, J.F., & Fullerton, S.K. (2000). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: the Guilford Press.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research: 255-291. NY: Longman.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3): 215–24.
Ary, D. Jacobs, L.C., Razavieh, A.,& Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8thed). California: The Thompson Corporation.
Bahar, M., & Hansell, M.H. (2000). The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on theperformance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology, 20 (3): 349-364.
Bortolotto.(2008). Explicit teaching of visualizing using RIDER strategy will improve the comprehension of a whole class of grade four students, (online) retrieved on Januari 5, 2015 from https://students.education.unimelb.edu.au /LiteracyResearch/pub/Projects/Intake%2016/CBortolotto_AR.pdf
Fitriani, I. (2015). Panorama strategy and second language content area reading comprehension skill of students accross cognitive style and gender. Malang: Unpublished Graduate Thesis.
Gambrell, L. B. (1982). Induced mental imagery and the text prediction performance of first and third graders. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), New Inquiries inReading Research and Instruction. Thirty-first Yearbook of the National Reading Conference: 131-135. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
Gambrell, L.B., and Jawitz, P.B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children’s story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 23: 265-273.
Ghazanfari, M. (2009). The role of visualization in efl learners' reading comprehension and recall of short stories. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 1 (1): 1-23.
Hobbs, R. (2001). Improving reading comprehension by using media literacy activities. Voices from the Middle, 8(4): 44-50.
Kahtz, A. W., & Kling, G. J. (1999). Field-dependent and field-independent conceptualization of various instructional methods with an emphasis on CAI: A qualitative analysis. Educational Psychology 19: 413-428.
Krashen, S. (2003). Exploration in language acquisition and use. New York: Heinamann.
Luk, S. C. (1998). The influence of a distance-learning environment on students’
field dependence/independence. The Journal of Experimental Education, 66:149-160.
Maghsudi, M. (2007). The interaction between field-dependent/independent learning styles and learners’ linguality in third language acquisition. language in india, (online) retrieved on July 15, 2015 from http:/bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu.
Marta. (2010). Explicit teaching of the visualization strategy rider to year 2 students will improve reading comprehension of narrative text. (online) retrieved on January 4, 2015 from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/northernadelaide/ files/links /RIDER_ long.pdf.
McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: theories, interventions, and technologies. mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Oakhill, J., & Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal of Research in Reading, 14(2): 106-115.
Ovilia, R. (2019). The relationship of topic familiarity and listening comprehension. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 276, 182-186.
Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Rahmaniah, S. (2015). Genre familiarity vs topic familiarity as factors affecting efl reading comprehension across gender. Malang: Unpublished thesis master.
Riding, R.J., &Rayner, S.G. (2000). International perspectives on individual differences–volume 1: cognitive stles. Stamford: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Sadoski, M., &Willson, V. L. (2006). Effects of a theoretically based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1): 137-154.
Syafitri, W. (2014). The impact of flipped classroom on reading comprehension of high school students with different cognitive learning styles. Malang: Unpublished graduated thesis.
Tomlinson, B. (1997). The role of visualization in the reading of literature by learners of a foreign language. Nottingham: Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Microfilmed version: The British library, British Thesis Service.
Witkins, H., Moore, C. Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. (1977). Field-independent and field-dependent cognitive style and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47 (1): 1-64.
Zeigler, L.L. & J. L. Johns (2005). Visualization: Using mental images to strengthen comprehension. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Article Metrics


Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.