Flipped Classroom sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran pada Mata Pelajaran Dasar Listrik dan Elektronika

Abdul Hamid(1), Hansi Effendi(2),
(1)   Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author


DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jtev.v5i1.105414

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research aims to investigate the differences in student learning outcomes by applying the flipped classroom and conventional model. This study uses quasi-experiments with state group comparison design which was conducted in grade 10 of Electrical Installation Engineering. The simple random sampling techniques are used to determine the experiment and control class. The data were collected using student performance assessment instruments which were assessed from several aspects such as preparation, process, outcomes, safety, and reporting. There are differences in learning outcomes from grade 10 of Electrical Installation Engineering that applied the flipped classroom learning model and conventional model on the subjects of Basic Electrical and Electronics at Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Muhammadiyah 1 Padang. The learning outcome of the experimental class higher than the conventional ones. According to statistics, the differences are significant. The uses of flipped classrooms can be applied as an alternative in learning of Basic Electrical and Electronics Subject. 


Keywords


flippedclassroom; student learning outcomes; video

References


M. Kuntari Eri and M. Widyaiswara, “Pendidikan Abad 21 Dan Implementasinya Pada Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK) Untuk Paket Keahlian Desain Interior,” in Artikel Kurikulum 2013 SMK, 2013.

Slameto, Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.

Suryosubroto, Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009.

A. Basal, “The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., 2015.

Z. M. Effendi, H. Effendi, and H. Effendi, “IMPLIKASI GAYA BELAJAR DALAM DESAIN BLENDED LEARNING,” J. Teknol. Inf. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 72–80, 2015.

Z. Mawardi Effendi, H. Effendi, and H. Effendi, “The role of locus control and learning styles in the development of the blended learning model at PSU,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 13, no. 7, 2017.

L.-C. Wolff and J. Chan, “Erratum to: Flipped Classrooms for Legal Education,” 2016.

Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta.,” Metod. Penelit. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R D.BandungAlfabeta., 2012.

Trianto, Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan bagi Pengembangan Profesi Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Media Group, 2010.

Institute for Digital Research and Education, “What are the differences between one ­ tailed and two ­tailed tests?,” Statistical Computing Seminars, 2014. .

Prastowo, Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva PressMhd, 2012.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 981 times
 PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Downloaded : 502 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.