Critical Discourse Study of Online Media News about Cameron Herrin Issues: The Analysis of Van Dijk's Ideological Square
), Andi Muhammad Irawan(2), (1) Universitas Negeri Padang
Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang
Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2024 Sundari Sundari
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i1.126512
Full Text:
Language : English
Abstract
This research is aimed at finding out, anayzing and classifying (1) the discourse topics) (2) the discourse strategies on the two online news texts 1) Cameron Herrin went to prison for Tampa crash. Were the tweets followed real? 2) Cameron Herrrin: How Privilege Can Make You Get Away with Murder?. In this research, the researcher use qualitative method to analyze and classify the data in the term of written-text by using Van Dijk’s analytical approach of ideological namely positive-self and negative-other presentations. The researcher analysed the discourses presented in several news textt. This study focuses on the attacks that Herrin receives through social media and also what priilege Herrrin has so that many people defend him. From two texts being analysed, the researcher has collected 34 data. By utilizing Van Dijk’s ideological structure, the researcher found out 25 discourse topics implied in ‘Cameron Herrin went to prison for Tampa crash. Were the tweets followed real? And ‘Cameron Herrin: How Privilege Can Make You Get Away with Murder.’ Furthermore, there are 8 discourse strategies in the texts such as victimization, metaphor, hyperbole, repetition, vagueness, euphemism, parallelism, and simile which is most often found in the text ‘Cameron Herrin: How Privilege Can Make You Get Away with Murder’.
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.
Bustan, E., & Alakrash, H. M. (2020). An analysis of impoliteness strategies performed by Donald Trump tweets addressıng the middle east countries. Global journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1, 66-74.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Critical metaphor analysis. In Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis (pp. 243-253). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dewi, S. R., Destriyana, S., & Nurhayati, E. (2019). A. VAN DIJK TEUN ANALYSIS IN SONTOLOYO POLITICAL DISCUSSION. JLER (Journal of Language Education Research), 2(3), 58-74.
Hashemi, A., & NA, K. S. (2021). A critical discourse analysis of a news report on two mosques shooting in Christchurch-New Zealand. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 7(1), 24-32.
Pratiwi, V. U., Nofrahadi, N., Pendri, A., Komalasari, D., & Sumarlam, S. (2020). News text on Kompas. com media of Covid-19 and the underlying conspiracy theory: A Teun Van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(4), 3894-3903.
Preminger, A., & Brogan, T. V. (1993). The new Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics (p. 1036a). F. J. Warnke, O. B. Hardison, & E. Miner (Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse
& society, 4(2), 249-283.
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 97 times
PDF Downloaded : 30 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sundari Sundari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
