An Analysis of Logical Fallacy in Argument of Campaign Team of Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto
), (1) Universitas Negeri Padang
Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 E-Journal English Language and Literature
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v9i4.107977
Full Text:
Language : en
Abstract
This research was aimed to find the types of logical fallacies in argument of campaign team debate of Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto. This research was descriptive qualitative. The data were analyzed by using theory of Damer (2009). The result of the research showed that of all sixty types of fallacy, there were only fifteen types were found. There are twelve types of fallacies produced by campaign team of Joko Widodo with twenty six occurrences and nine types of fallacies produced by campaign team of Prabowo with thirty three occurrences. Drawing the wrong conclusion fallacy was the most dominant type produced by campaign team of Jokowi with the proportion 19.23 %. The most dominant types produced by campaign team of Prabowo are using the wrong reasons and contrary-to-fact-hypothesis with the proportion 33.33%.
Key words: Logical fallacy, argument, campaign team debate
References
Al-hindawi, F. H., Alkhazaali, M. A. R.., & Al-Awadi, D. (2015). A Pragmatic Study of Fallacy in David Cameron's Political Speeches. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2 (2): 214-239.
Damer, T. E. (2009). Attacking Faulty Reasoning (6th Edition ed.): Wadsworth Publishing.
El Khoiri, N., & Widiati, U. (2017). Logical Fallacies in Indonesian EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing: Students' Perspectives. Dinamika Ilmu , 17 (1).
Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2008). Argumentation and Debate "Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making" (12th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Melakodipes, C. (2018). Brief Remarks on President R.T. Erdogan and His Allies' Methodical Use of Logical Fallacies. Journal of Political Science. 20 (3): 376-385.
Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Santoso, J. M. (2017). A Fallacy Analysis of the Arguments on the First U.S. Presidential Debate Between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Journal Kita. 5 (2): 65-71.
Zhou, Z. C. (2018). The Logical Fallacies in Political Discourse. Summer Research Program. http:/crossworks.holycross.edu/mellon summer_research/5
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 406 times
PDF Downloaded : 102 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 E-Journal English Language and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
