Sustainability and efficiency in school management: A bibliometric portrait of smart school research
), Syunu Trihantoyo(2), Karwanto Karwanto(3), Aditya Chandra Setiawan(4), (1) Educational Management, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Indonesia
(2) Educational Management, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Indonesia
(3) Educational Management, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Indonesia
(4) Educational Management, Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Indonesia
Corresponding Author
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jbmp.v15i1.139172
Abstract
Smart-school initiatives are expected to improve educational services while supporting sustainable and efficient school management, yet the research landscape remains fragmented across technological, pedagogical, environmental, and leadership perspectives. This study maps the development and conceptual structure of smart-school scholarship published from 2010 to October 2025. Bibliographic records were retrieved from Scopus through title, abstract, and keyword searches. An initial 295 records were identified, and 261 English-language records within the defined period were retained for descriptive and network analyses. Publication growth, country and institutional productivity, document types, subject areas, and keyword co-occurrence were examined using Scopus analytics and VOSviewer 1.6.20. The findings show modest output during 2010–2018, rapid expansion from 2019, and a peak of 40 publications in 2023; the 2025 value is partial and should not be interpreted as a full-year decline. Malaysia was the most productive country, with Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia as the leading affiliation. Articles and conference papers dominated the corpus, while computer science, social sciences, and engineering formed the principal disciplinary bases. Keyword mapping produced interconnected clusters concerning digital pedagogy, Internet of Things infrastructure, sustainability and energy efficiency, human-centered management, and artificial intelligence. The study concludes that smart-school research is moving from technology adoption toward integrated socio-technical governance. Sustainable implementation therefore requires digital leadership, teacher capability, responsible data use, efficient infrastructure, and collaboration among school and community stakeholders.
Keywords
References
Abulibdeh, A. (2024). Towards zero-carbon, resilient, and community-integrated smart schools and campuses: A review. World Development Sustainability, 5, 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2024.100193
Al-Badi, A., Tarhini, A., & Al-Mawali, H. (2020). The challenges faced during the implementation of smart schools in Oman. In Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation (pp. 373–389). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34269-2_26
Almonawer, N., Althonayan, A., Alainati, S., Al-Hammad, F., Haque, R., & Senathirajah, A. R. B. S. (2023). Transformational leadership style and school transformation: The case of secondary schools in Kuwait. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 29(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.46970/2022.29.1.4
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bhutoria, A., & Aljabri, N. (2022). Managerial practices and school efficiency: A data envelopment analysis across OECD and MENA countries using TIMSS 2019 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00147-3
Chandra, W., Purba, J. T., & Hariandja, E. S. (2025). Drivers of strategic insights for institutions’ sustainability through the operation of dynamic capabilities: Evidence from private schools in Jakarta. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(4), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0140
Jeladze, E., & Pata, K. (2018). Smart, digitally enhanced learning ecosystems: Bottlenecks to sustainability in Georgia. Sustainability, 10(8), 2672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082672
Karakaş, A., & Kartal, G. (2025). Mapping research on English-medium instruction through a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2548574
Liu, Q., & Li, Y. (2025). Digital-technology-enhanced immersive learning in Chinese secondary school geography education: A comprehensive comparative analysis of sustainable pedagogical transformation. Sustainability, 17(18), 8478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188478
Mama, M., & Hennessy, S. (2010). Level of technology integration by primary teachers in Cyprus and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.491238
Mardin, N. F. R. H., & Haning, M. T. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of smart school program as a policy innovation in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 7570–7577. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3639
Mogas, J., Palau, R., Fuentes, M., & Cebrián, G. (2022). Smart schools on the way: How school principals from Catalonia approach the future of education within the fourth industrial revolution. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 875–893.
Ong, E. T., & Ruthven, K. (2010). The distinctiveness and effectiveness of science teaching in the Malaysian “smart school.” Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140903513557
Pardo-Baldoví, M. I., San Martín-Alonso, Á., & Peirats-Chacón, J. (2023). The smart classroom: Learning challenges in the digital ecosystem. Education Sciences, 13(7), 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070662
Pillai, D., Doifode, A., Singh, A. S., & Bhosale, T. (2024). Fostering learner-centric education through smart technology. In AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245203
Riansyah, R. J., & Bethany, L. (2024). Towards entrepreneurial campus sustainability: Integrating artificial intelligence for resource allocation in business management. APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship, 6(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v6i3.410
Shah, K. U. (2024). Profiling national institutional archetypes for climate-change technology implementation: Application in small islands and least developed countries. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10134-4
Shin, J., Mollah, M. A., & Choi, J. (2023). Sustainability and organizational performance in South Korea: The effect of digital leadership on digital culture and employees’ digital capabilities. Sustainability, 15(3), 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032027
Singh, A., Bakken, J. P., Uskov, V. L., & Velampalli, M. M. (2024). Smart university: A bibliometric analysis. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (pp. 107–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4954-6_9
Sneesl, R., Jusoh, Y. Y., Jabar, M. A., & Abdullah, S. (2022). Revising technology adoption factors for IoT-based smart campuses: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(8), 4840. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084840
Suster, G., Popescu, C. A., Iancu, T., Popescu, G., & Ciolac, R. (2025). The synergy of smart campus development with smart city policies and the New European Bauhaus with implications for educational efficiency. Sustainability, 17(17), 8078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178078
Yen, D. T. H., Hung, L. N., Vu, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Factors affecting smart school leadership competencies of high school principals in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.4.1
Yusufu, G., & Nathan, N. (2020). A novel model of smart education for the development of smart university system. In Proceedings of the International Conference in Mathematics, Computer Engineering and Computer Science. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCECS47690.2020.240912
Zain, M. Z. M., Atan, H., & Idrus, R. M. (2004). The impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on the management practices of Malaysian smart schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2003.10.010
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 111 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
