Profil penguasaan konsep siswa pada materi suhu dan kalor dalam peer instructions

Putri Sundari - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


Concepts understanding is important for students in determining the success of their learning. One concept that is considered difficult by students is temperature and heat. Concept understanding can be disabled through learning peer instructions. This research aims to determine the profile of students' concepts understanding in the material temperature and heat. This research is a quasi-experiment with one group pretest-posttest model applied to 33 students of class X MIA 6 of SMA Negeri 1 Krian Sidoarjo. The research instrument used were treatment and measurement instruments. The treatment instruments consisted of syllabus, lesson plans, worksheets, and learning observation sheets. While the measurement instruments consist of pre-class reading assignments and concept tests. The research data were analyzed by determining the pattern of the distribution of students' answers on the concept test. From the results of the study showed that there are 3 patterns of changes in students' answers on the concept test that is from true-false, true-false, false-other false. In addition, after obtaining peer instruction learning, there is an increase of students' physics concepts understanding in the material temperature and heat.

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Setyadi, E. K., dan Komalasari, A. 2012. Miskonsepsi tentang Suhu dan Kalor pada Siswa Kelas 1 di SMA Muhammadiyah Purworejo, Jawa Tengah. Berkala Fisika Indonesia, 4(1&2): 46-49.

Ornek, Funda, William R. Robinson, and Mark P. Haugan. 2008. What Makes Physics Difficult. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2008, 3(1), 30–34.

Alwan, A. A. 2011. Misconception of Heat and Temperature Among Physics Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12: 600–614.

Chu, H. E., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., And Zadnik, M. 2012. Evaluation of Students‟ Understanding of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10): 1509-1534.

Rimadani, E., Parno., dan Diantoro, M. 2016. Penguasaan Konsep dan Kamampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Prosiding Semnas IPA Pascasarjana UM, Vol 1, 2016: 201-207.

Scott, S., and Maier, M. H. 2010. Just in Time Teaching. Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Mazur, E., and Crouch, C. 2001. A Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experiences and Results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9): 970-977.

Mazur, E. 1997. Peer Instruction. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.

Creswell, John, W. 2013. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches 4th Edition. California: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Miller, K., Schell, J., Andrew,. H., Lukoff, B., and Mazur, E. 2015. Respose Switching and Self-efficacy in Peer Instruction Clasroom. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11 010104: 1-8.

Lemos, M., Rocha, H., Menezes, C. 2016. Adoption of Just-in-Time Teaching, Peer Instruction and Problem-based Learning Impacts on Engineering Students Performance. International Journal of Active Learning, 1(1): 89-

Young, J. M. 2013. Using Peer Instruction Pedagogy for Teaching Dynamics: Lessons Learned from Pre-Class Reading Quizzes. Paper presented on The Canadian Engineer Education Association Conf. Montreal, June 2013.

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Krauter, K., and Knight, J.K. 2011. Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In Class Concept Questions. Life Science Education,10: 55-63.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/8226171074