Analisis e-book fisika SMA kelas X semester ganjil didasarkan pada integrasi literasi informasi

Hasbi Aziz - Universitas Negeri Padang
Yumelda Marzuki - Universitas Negeri Padang
Festiyed Festiyed - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


Entering the 21st century one component of basic literacy is information literacy. At this time with various facilities and availability of facilities, and various demands that require everyone to be capable and sophisticated with information. The global era with many phenomena of information requires the ability to be able to access the information wisely. Literacy is more than just reading and writing, but includes thinking skills using knowledge sources in printed, visual, digital and auditory books. In this 21st century, this ability is called information of literacy. One of the supporting facilities that support the information in learning is teaching materials. However, teaching materials that are often used by students are printed books. In this digital era, it is very easy for us to access and use the process of non-printed teaching materials (e-books). It can also be used as textbooks that support students to increase information literacy. Therefore non-printed teaching materials (e-books) should contain information literacy to support learning. The purpose of this research is to obtain information about the scope of information literacy which are includes media literacy, technology literacy and visual literacy in e-books in circulation. This research uses descriptive research method. The research population was all material in the odd semester High School Physics e-books analyzed. The population in this research was taken all the material to be sampled. The instrument used as an observation sheet is an observation sheet containing information literacy indicators. From the five e-books analyzed based on aspect of information literacy, was obtained the results of the average suitability obtained for each e-book that is in e-book 1 has a value of 46% with a less good category.  In e-book 2 has a value of 71% with a good category. In e-book 3, it has a value of 54% with a less good category.  In e-book 4, it has a value of 48% with a less good category.  Finally in e-book 5 it has a value of 61 with a less good category.

 


Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Adisendjaja Yusuf Helmi. 2014. Analisis Buku Ajar Biologi SMA Kelas X di Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Aditia, M. Taufik. 2013. Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Sains, Lingkungan, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Islam (Salingtemasis) Dalam Meningktkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Konsep Ekosistem Kelas X di SMA NU (Nadhatul ulama) Lemahabang Kabupaten Cerebon. Jurnal Scientiae Educatia, Volume 2, Edisi 2.

Annisa Indri, Nurjhani Mimin, Syulasmi Ammi. 2014. Relevansi Kualitas Media Visual dan Literasi Visual Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan. Jurnal Antologi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1, hlm 1-6

Asrizal, A.Amran, A., Ananda., Festiyed. F. 2018. Effectiveness of Adaptive Contextual Learning Model Of Integrated Science by Integrating Digital Age literacy on grade VIII student. Jurnal IOP Conferences series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol (335). Conference (1). 1-8

Asrizal, Festiyed, & Sumarmin. 2017. Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu Bermuatan Literasi Era Digital Untuk Pembelajaran Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), Volume 1.

Bybee, R. W. (2013, January 7). What is STEM Education. Retrieved from www. sciencemag.org.

Darmayanti Riska. 2016. Membangun Budaya Literasi Informasi Bagi Masyarakat Kampus. Jurnal Iqra’ Vol. 10 No. 11, hlm 92-10

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. 2016. Desain Induk Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. [online]. Tersedia: www.kemendikbut.go.id

Festiyed. 2018. Implementasi Model Pembela jaran Trait Treatment Interaction (TTI) Menggunakan Multimedia Swshmax 4.0. Natural Science Journal, 4(2), 636-650.

Festied, Murtiani. 2013. Meningkatkan capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah computer dalam pembelajaran fisika melalui implemtasi model learning cycle 5E (engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, evaluation). EKSAKTA, 2(1),1-7

Hasugian, J. 2008. Urgensi Literasi Informasi dalam Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan dan Informasi, Vol. 4, No. 2.

Heriyanto,Aan Prabowo. 2013. Analisis Pemamfaatan Buku Elektronik (E-Book) Oleh Pemustaka Di Perpustakaan SMA Negeri 1 Semarang. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Volume 2, Nomor 2.

Husaebah Sitti. 2014, Literasi Informasi : Peningkatan Kompetensi Informasi Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan 7 Kearsipan Khizanah Al-Hikmah, Vol. 2 No. 2, hlm 117-128

Mahsuri Ilham. 2012. Implementasi Literasi di Sekolah. Jurnal Pustakaloka Vol. 4 No.1, hlm 61-72

Marseno, R., Kusuma, W. A., & Saleh, A. R. 2014. Identifikasi literasi infomasi dalam rangka pengembangan kurikulum di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pustakawan Indonesia, 13(2), 8-17.

Novitasari, L. Handhika, J. 2018. Profil Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Instrumen Kognitif Literasi Sains untuk Peserta didik SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Quantum

Nurannisa Siti. 2017. Menghadapi Generalisasi Visual; Literasi Visual Untuk Menstimulasi Kemampuan Berpikir Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Vol. 1 No. 2a hlm 48-59

Nurohman, A. 2014. Signifikansi literasi infor masi (information literacy) dalam dunia pendidikan di era global. Jurnal Kepen didikan, Vol. 2 No. 1

Olayinka, Abdu-Raheen Bilqees. 2016. Effects of Instructional Materials On Secondrary Schools Students’ Academic Achievenment In Social Studies In Ekiti State, Nigeria. World Journal Of Education. Vol. 6, No. 2.

Pattah, S. H. 2014. Literasi informasi: pening katan kompetensi informasi dalam proses pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan & Kearsipan Khizanah Al- Hikmah, Vol. 2 No. 2, hlm117-128.

Purba Rebekka. 2015. Tingkat Literasi Media Pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Universitas Sumatera Utara Vol. 2, No. 9

Pusat perbukuan Depdiknas. 2003. Standar penilaian buku pelajaran sains.[online]. Tersedia: http/www.dikdaski.go.id.

Saepudin, E., Damayani. Sukaesih. 2016. Lite rasi Media Bagi Guru PAUD di Kecamatan Cicalengka. Jurnal Aplikasi Ipteks Untuk Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1, hlm 38-43

Sanjaya, W. 2010. Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: kencana prenada media group.

Sitohang, candra, et al. 2015. pengembangan buku ajar berbasis kontekstual Dengan tema “sehat itu penting”. jurnal teknologi informasi & komunikasi dalam pendidikan, vol. 2, no. 2, p-issn: 2355-4983; e-issn: 2407-7488.

Sukardi, 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Pendi dikan: Kompetensi dan Praktiknya, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suwanto Ati Sri. 2015. Analisis Literasi Infor masi Pemakai Taman Bacaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan. Vol. 3 No. 1, hlm 89-99

Trianto. 2009, Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif: Konsep, Landasan dan Implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Ken cana Prenada Media Group.

US National Commission on Library and Infor mation Science, (2003). Information Literacy. http://www.nclis.-gov/libinter/ info litconf&meet/postinfolitconf&meet/PragueDeclaration .pdf. [20 November 2019]

Wahyuni, Sri. 2015. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF) Volume 5 Nomor 2.

Wijetunge, P., & Alahakoon, U. P. 2005. Empowering 8: The Information Literacy Model Developed in Sri Lanka to Underpin Changing Education Paradigms of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Librarianship and Information Management, 1(1), 31–41.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/7745171074