Analisis miskonsepsi peserta didik dalam memahami materi gerak lurus dan gerak parabola pada kelas X SMAN 1 Padang

Aifah Fauziah - Universitas Negeri Padang
Yenni Darvina - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


The purpose of research analyzes misconceptions of students in understanding the material stairght motion and parabolic motion in class X SMAN 1 Padang. This type of research was descriptive with a quantitative approach. The population this research was all students class X SMAN 1 Padang who were enrolled in the 2018/2019 school year. The sampling in this research taken with purposive sampling technique. The sample in this research consisted of five classes. The research instrument was a multipe choice FCI test question with open reasons accompanied by CRI. The result of anlyziz data gotten that avrage of misconceptions was 67,5%, unknowing was 22,86%, knowing was 8,42%, knowing but not sure was 1,29%. The froms of misconception experienced by students are: 1) heavy bals faster than light balls, 2) the greater the gravitational force if it approaches the ground or the surface of the earth, 3) the acceleration of the beam b is greater than the beam  a  because when beam a was on the five line beam B was on seven line. The causes of misconceptions are associative thinking, humanistic thinking, wrong intuisi, incomplete/ wrong reasoning, cognitive development, students abilities, and student experience.

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Suyono & Hariyanto. 2011.Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Yuyu R. Tayubi. 2005. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika Menggunakan Certainty Of Respon Index (CRI). Mimbar Pendidikan (No. 3 Tahun XXIV, 2015). Hlm. 4-9.

Suparno Paul. 2013. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Ratnawulan. 2001.“ Efektivitas Pembelajaran Model Kontruktivisme Berdasarkan Strategi Konflik Kognitif Dalam Pelajaran Fisika Di SMU.” Laporan Penelitian. UNP

Suparno Paul. 2013. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

S. Gumilar. S. 2016. Analisis Miskonsepsi Konsep Gaya Menggunakan Certainty Of Respon Index (CRI). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(2), 59 – 71.

Sugiyono. 2012. Statiska untuk penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta

Syuhendri. 2014. Konsepsi Alternatif Mahasiswa Pada Ranah Mekanika: Analisis Untuk Konsep Impetus dan Kecepatan Benda. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika.1(1). 56-57.

Sugiyono. 2012. Statiska untuk penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta

Hasan. s. Bagokayo, D ., & Kelley, E.L. 1999. Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Physic Education on Journal. 34(5). 294-299.

Hakim, Aliefman, dkk. 2012. Student Concept Understanding of natural product chemistry in primary and secondary metabolies using the data collecting technique of modified CRI. International Online Journal oh education sciences. 4(3). 545-553.

Giancoli. 2001. Fisika. Jakarta: Erlangga.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/4813171074