VALIDATION OF STUDENT WORKSHEET CONTAINING SCIENTIFIC LITERACY FOR STRAIGHT MOTION MATERIALS

Dwi Yulianti - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Renol Afrizon - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Hidayati Hidayati - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
putri sundari - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Emiliannur Emiliannur - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia

Abstract


The 21st century demands that students be able to have critical thinking competencies, communicate, relate global issues and literacy of scientific. Efforts made by the government to meet these demands are by improving the curriculum and holding the program of School Literacy Movement. But in reality there are problems related to literacy which is applied only to note and listen to the teacher, the unavailability of worksheets in all subjects, and the low understanding of students in answering questions. One way to deal with this issue is to develop a physics worksheet containing literacy in scientific. The research purpose was to determine of Characteristics of LKS containing literacy of scientific in straight motion material. This research type was  design research (Design Research). The research object was the physics worksheet with literacy of scientific on the material of straight motion. The research instrument used was a self-evaluation assessment sheet, a one to one assessment sheet consisting of material components, learning design, implementation and technical. Expert validation sheet consisting of content, linguistic, presentation, and graphic feasibility components. The data analysis technique uses Aiken's formula to be able to calculate the content validity coefficient. The results of the LKS validation assessment obtained a value on the content feasibility component of 0.8 in the category was valid, the value on the linguistic feasibility component of 0.75 in the category was valid, the value on the presentation feasibility component of 0.77 in the category was valid, and the value on the feasibility component graphics of 0.83 in the category was very valid. Based on the results of research on physics worksheets containing literacy of scientific in the category was valid with an average validity value of 0.79.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrizon, R., Dwiridal, Letmi. 2017. Upaya Menumbuhkan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Melalui Kajian Konsep Fisika Pada Arsitektur Kearifan Lokal Budaya Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), Volume 1. No 2, e-ISSN 279-860X.

Agustin, Silvia., Afrizon, Renol., Hidayati. 2019. Pengujian Validasi Bahan Ajar Fisika Bermuatan Literasi Saintifik Pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi, Kesetimbangan Benda Tegar, Elastisitas dan Hukum Hooke. Pillar of Physics Education, Vol 12. N0 4, 641-648.

Aiken, L. R. 1985. Three Coefficients For Analyzing The Reliability And Validity Of Ratings. Malibu: Pepperdine University.

Anwar, Muhammad. 2015. Filsafat Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Astuti, Y. K. (2016). Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Journal Universitas Wiralodra, 67-72.

Azwar, S. (2012). Reabilitas Dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Eftiwin, L. 2021. Pengembangan Assessment Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Materi Interaksi Makhluk Hidup Dengan Lingkunganya Di SMP Se-Kota Bengkulu. Bengkulu: Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu.

Kusuman, Alingga. 2016. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Pelajaran Dasar dan Pengukuran Listrik Untuk Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. Vol 23, No 1.

Mulyasa, H. 2018. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi dalam Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

OECD. 2003. The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework. Paris: OECD.

Plomp, T. (2010). An Introduction to Education Design Research. Enschede: Netherlands institute for curriculum development.

Prastowo, A. 2013. Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Puji Anto, M. S. (2017). Perancangan Buku Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Ejaan Di Sekolah. Jurnal Desain, 92-99

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Sani, R. A. 2014. Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sudar, B. H. 2018. Fisika Untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Syahputra, Edi. 2018. Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional SINASTEKMAPAN, Vol 1, 2018, 1276-1282.

Syairi, Abu, Kairi. 2013. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab. Dinamika Ilmu, Volume 13, No 1.

Syaparuddiin. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar PKn Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 30-41

Tessmer, Martin. 1993. Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. London: Routledge.

Utami, B. 2016. Scientific skills in science lesson. (pp. 125-133). Semarang: Jurnal Prosiding ICTIE FKIP UNS.

Zalpita, Efni., Hidayati., Afrizon, Renol. 2020. Validasi LKS Fisika Bermuatan Literasi Saintifik Pada Materi Fluida. Pillar of Physics Education, Vol 13. No 2, 2020, 217-224.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/13947171074